Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Real and optimal neural images in early vision

Abstract

IT has been suggested1–3 that the first steps in visual processing strive to compress as much information as possible about the outside world into the limited dynamic range of the visual channels. Here I compare measured neural images with theoretical calculations based on maximizing information, taking into account the statistical structure of natural images. Neural images were obtained by scanning an image while recording from a second-order neuron in the fly visual system. Over a 5.5-log-units-wide range of mean intensities, experiment and theory correspond well. At high mean intensities, redundancy in the image is reduced by spatial and temporal antagonism. At low mean intensities, spatial and temporal low-pass filtering combat noise and increase signal reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barlow, H. B. in Sensory Communication (ed. Rosenblith, W. A) 217–234 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Srinivasan, M. V., Laughlin, S. B. & Dubs, A. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B216, 427–459 (1982).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laughlin, S. B. Trends Neurosci. 10, 478–483 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kretzmer, E. R. Bell Lab. Record Nov., 401–404 (1954).

  5. Atick, J. J. & Redlich, A. N. Neural Comput. 2, 308–320 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kretzmer, E. R. Bell Syst. tech. J. 31, 751–763 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Hateren, J. H. J. comp. Physiol. A 171, 157–170 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsukamoto, Y., Smith, R. G. & Sterling, P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 1860–1864 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldman, S. Information Theory (Dover, New York, 1953).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Atick, J. J. Network 3, 213–251 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laughlin, S. B. in Physical and Biological Processing of Images (eds Braddick, O. J. & Sleigh, A. C.) 42–53 (Springer, Berlin, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Burton, G. J. & Moorhead, I. R. Appl. Opt 26, 157–170 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Field, D. J. J. opt. Soc. Am. A4, 2379–2394 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laughlin, S. B. & Hardie, R. C. J. comp. Physiol. 128, 319–340 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hateren, J. Real and optimal neural images in early vision. Nature 360, 68–70 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/360068a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/360068a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing