Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Control of the sperm–oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites by the fem-3 3′ untranslated region

Abstract

IN the Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodite germ line, sperm and then oocytes are made from a common pool of germ-cell precursors. The decision to differentiate as a sperm or an oocyte is regulated by the sex-determining gene,fem-3. Expression of fem-3 in the hermaphrodite germ line directs spermatogenesis and must be negatively regulated to allow the switch to oogenesis1,2. In adult hermaphrodites (which are producing oocytes), mostfem-3 RNA is found in the germ line3, consistent with both the requirement for fem-3 in hermaphrodite spermatogenesis and the maternal effects of fem-3 on embryonic sex determination1,2Whereas loss-of-function mutants in fem-3 produce only oocytes, hermaphrodites carrying any of nine fem-3 gain-of-function (gf) mutations make none; instead sperm are produced continuously and in vast excess over wild-type amounts1Genetic analyses suggest that fem-3(gf) mutations have escaped a negative control required for the switch to oogenesis1. Here we report that all nine fem-3(gf) mutants carry sequence alterations in the fem-3 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR). There is no increase in the steady-state level of fem-3(gf) RNA over wild-type, but there is an increase in the polyadenylation of fem-3(gf) RNA that is coincident with the unregulated fem-3 sactivity. Results of a titration experiment support the hypothesis that a regulatory factor may bind the fem-3 3′ UTR. We speculate that fem-3 RNA is regulated through its 3′ UTR by binding a factor that inhibits translation, and discuss the idea that this control may be part of a more general regulation of maternal RNAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barton, M. K., Schedl, T. & Kimble, J. Genetics 115, 107–119 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgkin, J. Genetics 114, 15–52 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenquist, T. A. & Kimble, J. Genes Dev. 2, 606–616 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wickens, M. Trends biochem. Sci. 15, 320–324 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson, R. J. & Standart, N. Cell 62, 15–24 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrew, L. L., Dworkin-Rastl, E., Dworkin, M. B. & Richter, J. D. Genes Dev. 3, 803–815 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vassalli, J.-D. et al. Genes Dev. 3, 2163–2171 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun, R. E., Peschon, J. J., Behringer, R. R., Brinster, R. L. & Palmiter, R. D. Genes Dev. 3, 793–802 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kruys, V. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 6030–6034 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruys, V., Marinx, O., Shaw, G., Deschamps, J. & Huez, G. Science 245, 852–854 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ch'ng, J. L. C., Shoemaked, D. L., Schimmel, P. & Holmes, E. W. Science 248, 1003–1006 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Doniach, T. Genetics 114, 53–76 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schedl, T. & Kimble, J. Genetics 119, 43–61 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Vournakis, J. N., Efstratiadis, A. & Kafatos, F. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 2959–2963 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fire, A., Harrison, S. M. W. & Dixon, D. Gene 93, 189 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fire, A. EMBO J. 5, 2673–2680 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahringer, J., Kimble, J. Control of the sperm–oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans hermaphrodites by the fem-3 3′ untranslated region. Nature 349, 346–348 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349346a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349346a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing