Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Adult and embryonic mouse neural cell adhesion molecules have different binding properties

Abstract

Interactions between neural cell surfaces seem to be of prime importance during neuroontogenesis, and responsible for the guidance of migrating neuroblasts and growing axons and for the formation of synapses. Little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms, but most hypotheses imply the existence of cell-surface molecules that mediate the formation of transient or permanent bonds between neural cells. Recently, a membrane glycoprotein called neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) has been characterized in chick1,2 and rodent3 nervous tissue that appears to act as a ligand in adhesion among neural cell bodies4,5 or neurites6. We have identified a mouse neural surface glycoprotein, named BSP-2 (ref. 7), which by criteria of electrophoretic migration7–9, developmental changes8,9, amino acid10 and sugar11 composition seems to be closely related or identical to N-CAM. Both BSP-2 (refs 8,9) and N-CAM2,12 undergo conversion from an embryonic to an adult form during brain development and it has been suggested that this transition changes the adhesive properties12 or the binding specificity8 of the molecule. Using a neuroblastoma line to study functional differences between embryonic and adult BSP-2/N-CAM molecules, we show here that liposomes bearing adult BSP-2 but not those bearing the embryonic form adhere to neuroblastoma cells, demonstrating that the two forms do indeed possess different binding properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman, S. et al. J. biol. Chem. 257, 7720–7729 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothbard, J. B., Brackenbury, R., Cunningham, B. A. & Edelman, G. M. J. biol. Chem. 257, 11064–11069 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chuong, C.-M., McClain, D. A., Streit, P. & Edelman, G. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 4234–4238 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutishauser, U., Thiery, J.-P., Brackenbury, R. & Edelman, G. M. J. Cell Biol. 79, 371–381 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutishauser, U., Hoffman, S. & Edelman, G. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 685–689 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutishauser, U., Gall, W. E. & Edelman, G. M. J. Cell Biol. 79, 382–393 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirn, M., Pierres, M., Deagostini-Bazin, H., Hirsch, M. & Goridis, C. Brain Res. 214, 433–439 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rougon, G., Deagostini-Bazin, H., Hirn, M. & Goridis, C. EMBO J. 1, 1239–1244 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirn, M., Ghandour, M. S., Deagostini-Bazin, H. & Goridis, C. Brain Res. 265, 87–100 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goridis, C., Rougon, G., Hirsch, M., Deagostini-Bazin, H. & Hirn, M. in Proc. 1st int. Congr. Neuroimmunology (eds Spreafico, F. & Behan, P. O.) (Raven, New York, in the press).

  11. Finne, J., Finne, U., Deagostini-Bazin, H. & Goridis, C. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun. 112, 482–487 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Edelman, G. M. & Chuong, C.-M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 7036–7040 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grumet, M., Rutishauser, U. & Edelman, G. M. Nature 295, 693–695 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amano, T., Richelson, E. & Nirenberg, M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 1296–1301 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Legault-Demarre, L. et al. Expl Cell Res. 125, 233–239 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goridis, C., Hirn, M., Langley, O. K., Ghandour, S. & Gombos, G. Prog. Brain Res. 58, (in the press).

  17. Barbet, J., Machy, P. & Leserman, L. D. J. supramolic. Struct. cell. Biochem. 16, 243–258 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein, J. N., Blumenthal, R., Sharrow, S. O. & Henkart, P. Biochim. biophys. Acta 509, 272–288 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy, K. D. & de Vellis, J. J. Cell Biol. 85, 890–902 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Meindl, P., Bodo, G., Palese, P., Schulman, J. & Tuppy, H. Virology 58, 457–463 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadoul, R., Hirn, M., Deagostini-Bazin, H. et al. Adult and embryonic mouse neural cell adhesion molecules have different binding properties. Nature 304, 347–349 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/304347a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/304347a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing