Abstract
IN discussing the significance of the two planet-like bodies which are now supposed to revolve around 61 Cygni and 70 Ophiuchi, Mr. Sen writes1 that “we find that there can be at most two planetary systems in the galactic system, on Jeans's theory”. If the true number were two, or anything like two, it would, of course, be out of the question to suppose that there could be three planetary systems so near to us in space. But I do not think that the true number is anywhere near to two; in a recent letter in NATURE2, I calculated that something like one star in six might well be accompanied by planets, in which case the number of galactic planetary systems would not be two, but some tens of thousands of millions. There is no reason why 61 Cygni and 70 Ophiuchi should not be two out of these millions of systems, so that I think that Mr. Sen's argument against my tidal theory fails.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
NATURE, 152, 600 (1943).
NATURE, 149, 695 (1942).
loc. cit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JEANS, J. Non-Solar Planetary Systems. Nature 152, 721 (1943). https://doi.org/10.1038/152721a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/152721a0
This article is cited by
-
The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence and the Nasa High Resolution Microwave Survey (HRMS): Historical perspectives
Space Science Reviews (1993)
-
Levine's Hypothesis of Maternal Iso-immunization
Nature (1944)
-
Origin of the Solar System
Nature (1944)
-
Non-Solar Planetary Systems
Nature (1944)
-
Origin of the Solar System
Nature (1944)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.