Economic Analysis

Bone Marrow Transplantation (2005) 36, 539–546. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1705078; published online 25 July 2005

Economic analysis of unrelated allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: results from the randomized clinical trial of T-cell depletion vs unmanipulated grafts for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease

G de Lissovoy1, D Hurd2, S Carter3, P Beatty4, M Ewell3, J Henslee-Downey5, N Kernan6, S Yanovich7 and D Weisdorf8

  1. 1MEDTAP International Incorporated, Bethesda, MD, USA
  2. 2Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
  3. 3The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD, USA
  4. 4University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  5. 5Division of Transplantation Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
  6. 6Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
  7. 7Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA
  8. 8Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Correspondence: Dr G de Lissovoy, MEDTAP International Incorporated, Center of Health Economics, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. E-mail: deLissovoy@medtap.com

Received 12 January 2005; Accepted 25 May 2005; Published online 25 July 2005.

Top

Abstract

Unrelated-donor marrow transplantation is a potential option for transplant candidates lacking a compatible related donor. The T-cell Depletion Study compared the 3-year disease-free survival for patients receiving T-cell-depleted (TCD) donor marrow (n=203) vs unmanipulated donor marrow with methotrexate and cyclosporine (M/C) (n=207). Hospital costs during index admission were documented with billing data, while hospital costs during subsequent 6-month follow-up were estimated from case report forms. Patients with index admission billing were included in the analysis (TCD=119, M/C=127). Total hospital length of stay (LOS) was similar across groups, with medians 47.0 days for TCD and 52.0 days for M/C (P=0.72). Total hospital costs were comparable, $145 115 vs $141 981 (P=0.63) for TCD and M/C, respectively. However, controlling for site and patient characteristics, TCD was associated with a 12.1% reduction in LOS for the index admission (95% CI -19.4%, -4.3%). Independent of treatment, HLA matching (6/6) was associated with an 8.6% (95% CI -17.4%, +1.2%) reduction in the index admission LOS, while cost was lower by 15.8% (95% CI -26.7%, -3.3%). Treatment costs were similar for TCD and M/C study groups. Savings on reduced cost for treating acute graft-versus-host disease were likely offset by increase in serious infections in the TCD arm.

Keywords:

cost-effectiveness, economics, T-cell depletion

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

natureproducts


ADVERTISEMENT