Clinical Study

British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 581–586. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603291 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 1 August 2006

Sorafenib in advanced melanoma: a Phase II randomised discontinuation trial analysis

T Eisen1, T Ahmad1, K T Flaherty2, M Gore1, S Kaye1, R Marais1, I Gibbens1, S Hackett1, M James1, L M Schuchter2, K L Nathanson2, C Xia3, R Simantov3, B Schwartz3, M Poulin-Costello3, P J O'Dwyer2 and M J Ratain4

  1. 1Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Surrey SMT 5PT, UK
  2. 2Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  3. 3Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
  4. 4Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

Correspondence: Dr T Eisen, Urology, Skin and Lung Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sycamore House, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SMT 5PT, UK. E-mail: tim.eisen@icr.ac.uk

Received 10 April 2006; Revised 27 June 2006; Accepted 27 June 2006; Published online 1 August 2006.

Top

Abstract

The effects of sorafenib – an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting the tumour and tumour vasculature – were evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma enrolled in a large multidisease Phase II randomised discontinuation trial (RDT). Enrolled patients received a 12-week run-in of sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.). Patients with changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements <25% from baseline were then randomised to sorafenib or placebo for a further 12 weeks (ie to week 24). Patients with greater than or equal to25% tumour shrinkage after the run-in continued on open-label sorafenib, whereas those with greater than or equal to25% tumour growth discontinued treatment. This analysis focussed on secondary RDT end points: changes in bi-dimensional tumour measurements from baseline after 12 weeks and overall tumour responses (WHO criteria) at week 24, progression-free survival (PFS), safety and biomarkers (BRAF, KRAS and NRAS mutational status). Of 37 melanoma patients treated during the run-in phase, 34 were evaluable for response: one had greater than or equal to25% tumour shrinkage and remained on open-label sorafenib; six (16%) had <25% tumour growth and were randomised (placebo, n=3; sorafenib, n=3); and 27 had greater than or equal to25% tumour growth and discontinued. All three randomised sorafenib patients progressed by week 24; one remained on sorafenib for symptomatic relief. All three placebo patients progressed by week-24 and were re-started on sorafenib; one experienced disease re-stabilisation. Overall, the confirmed best responses for each of the 37 melanoma patients who received sorafenib were 19% stable disease (SD) (ie n=1 open-label; n=6 randomised), 62% (n=23) progressive disease (PD) and 19% (n=7) unevaluable. The overall median PFS was 11 weeks. The six randomised patients with SD had overall PFS values ranging from 16 to 34 weeks. The most common drug-related adverse events were dermatological (eg rash/desquamation, 51%; hand-foot skin reaction, 35%). There was no relationship between V600E BRAF status and disease stability. DNA was extracted from the biopsies of 17/22 patients. Six had V600E-positive tumours (n=4 had PD; n=1 had SD; n=1 unevaluable for response), and 11 had tumours containing wild-type BRAF (n=9 PD; n=1 SD; n=1 unevaluable for response). In conclusion, sorafenib is well tolerated but has little or no antitumour activity in advanced melanoma patients as a single agent at the dose evaluated (400 mg b.i.d.). Ongoing trials in advanced melanoma are evaluating sorafenib combination therapies.

Keywords:

Sorafenib, multikinase inhibitor, advanced melanoma, V600E BRAF, randomised discontinuation trial

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

L-DOPA, dyskinesia and striatal plasticity

Nature Neuroscience News and Views (01 May 2003)