Clinical Study
British Journal of Cancer (2006) 94, 1361–1368. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603105 www.bjcancer.com
Published online 25 April 2006
A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival
C Parker1, D Muston2, J Melia2, S Moss2 and D Dearnaley1
- 1Academic Unit of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
- 2Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
Correspondence: Dr C Parker, E-mail: chris.parker@rmh.nhs.uk
Received 13 January 2006; Revised 23 March 2006; Accepted 23 March 2006; Published online 25 April 2006.
Abstract
The lead time and overdetection associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, and generational improvements in all-cause mortality, make prostate cancer outcome studies from the pre-PSA era difficult to interpret in a contemporary setting. We developed a competing-risks hazard model to estimate the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the impact of radical treatment on overall survival. The model of hazard of mortality was fitted to clinical outcome data from the pre-PSA era, and the effects of screening, generational mortality improvements and radical treatment were incorporated. Sensitivities to the choice of baseline data and values of key parameters were assessed. Lead-time estimates in men diagnosed aged 55–59 years were 14.1, 9.3 and 5.0 years for men with Gleason scores <7, 7 and >7, respectively, assuming biennial screening with 100% attendance. Central estimates of 15-year prostate cancer mortality for conservative management of screen-detected prostate cancer ranged from 0 to 2% for Gleason scores <7, 9 to 31% for Gleason score 7 and 28–72% for Gleason scores >7. For men aged 55–59 years at diagnosis, the predicted absolute 15-year survival benefit from curative treatment was 0, 12 and 26% for men with Gleason scores <7, 7 and >7, respectively. Estimates of the survival benefit of radical treatment were relatively insensitive to values of key parameters. The case for curative treatment, rather than conservative management, of screen-detected localised prostate cancer is strongest in men with high-grade disease. This conclusion contrasts with current patterns of care.
Keywords:
prostate cancer, model, outcomes
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
NEWS AND VIEWS
Prostate cancer Local control and radiotherapy matter in prostate cancer
Nature Reviews Urology News and Views (01 May 2009)
