Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Malignant melanoma: sex differences in survival after evidence of distant metastasis

Abstract

Survival data of 106 males and 110 females with disseminated malignant melanoma, recorded between 1956 and 1975, were reviewed. Survival after first evidence of distant metastasis was significantly longer in women than in men (P = 0.02). There was no difference in survival after occurrence of distant metastasis between pre- and postmenopausal women, nor between parous and nulliparous women. However, there was a clear female superiority of premenopausal women over males less than or equal to 50 years and, to a lesser extent, of postmenopausal women over males > 50 years. It is concluded that endocrine factors enhance melanoma activity in the male patient. The suggestion that malignant melanoma is "testosterone-dependent" seems justifiable. A possible explanation is given for the general experience that women with melanoma show a more favourable response to chemotherapy than men.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rampen, F. Malignant melanoma: sex differences in survival after evidence of distant metastasis. Br J Cancer 42, 52–57 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1980.202

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1980.202

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links