Abstract
The effect of sources of support on rehabilitation outcomes of 866 patients treated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Spinal Cord Injury Care System since 1973 was assessed using multiple linear and logistic regression. System admission was delayed for Medicaid beneficiaries, while patients who were responsible for at least a portion of their incurred charges were admitted sooner than other patients. Increased lengths of stay were noted among vocational rehabilitation clients and patients with either Workers' Compensation or private insurance coverage. Patients with Workers' Compensation also had significantly higher average hospital charges. Medicaid patients were more likely to be rehospitalised after discharge from rehabilitation. Vocational rehabilitation clients averaged fewer days in nursing homes after injury while Medicaid and Medicare patients experienced longer stays in nursing homes. We conclude that source of support has a significant impact on numerous measures of outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Carey R G, Seibert J H, Posavac E J 1988 Who makes the most progress in inpatient rehabilitation? An analysis of functional gain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 69: 337–343.
Carle T V, Eckenhoff E A 1979 Re: spinal cord injury costs. (Letter to the Editor.) Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60: 613.
Charles E D, Fine P R, Stover S L, et al 1978 The costs of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 15: 302–310.
Charles E D, Van Matre J G, Miller J M 1974 Spinal cord injury: a cost benefit analysis of alternative treatment modals. Paraplegia 12: 222–231.
Chatterjee S, Price B 1977 Regression Analysis by Example. Wiley, New York, pp 51–100.
DeVivo M J, Fine P R 1982 Employment status of spinal cord injured patients three years after injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 63: 200–203.
DeVivo M J, Kartus P L, Rutt R D, et al 1988 Outcomes of the older patient with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 26: 122–123.
DeVivo M J, Rutt R D, Stover S L, et al 1987 Employment after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 68: 494–498.
Deyoe F S Jr 1972 Spinal cord injury: long term follow-up of veterans. Archives of PhysicalMedicine and Rehabilitation 53: 523–529.
El Ghatit A Z Hanson R W 1978 Variables associated with obtaining and sustaining employment among spinal cord injured males: follow-up of 760 veterans. Journal of Chronic Disease 31: 363–369.
Felton J S, Litman M 1965 Study of employment of 222 men with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 46: 809–814.
Fine P R, Stover S L, DeVivo M J 1987 A methodology for predicting lengths of stay for spinal cord injury patients. Inquiry 24: 147–156.
Frankel H L, Hancock D O, Hyslop G, et al 1969 The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Part 1. Paraplegia 7: 179–192.
Geisler W O, Jousse A T, Wynne-Jones M 1966 Vocational re-establishment of patients with spinal cord injury. Medical Services Journal of Canada 22: 698–709.
Hamilton B B 1979 Re: spinal cord injury costs (Letter to the Editor). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60: 613.
Kleinbaum D G, Kupper L L, Morgenstern H 1982 Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, California, pp 420–491.
Levenson B, Green J 1965 Return to work after severe disability. Journal of Chronic Disease 18: 167–180.
Meyers A R, Feltin M, Master R J, et al 1985 Rehospitalisation and spinal cord injury: cross-sectional survey of adults living independently. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66: 704–708.
Miettinen O 1976 Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 103: 226–235.
Stover S L, Fine P R 1986 Spinal Cord Injury: The Facts and Figures. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.
Webb S B Jr, Berzins E, Wingardner T S, et al 1978 First year hospitalisation costs for the spinal cord injured patient. Paraplegia 15: 311–318.
Webb S B Jr, Berzins E, Wingardner T S, et al 1979 Spinal cord injury: epidemiologic implications, costs and patterns of care in 85 patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60: 335–340.
Yarkony G M, Roth E J, Heinemann A W et al 1987 Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury: multivariate analysis in 711 patients. Archives of Neurology 44: 93–96.
Young J S, Burns P E, Wilt G A Jr 1982 Medical charges incurred by the spinal cord injured during the first six years following injury. Model Systems' SCI Digest 4: 19–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was presented at the 14th Annual Meeting of the American Spinal Injury Association, San Diego, California, 2 May 1988.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeVivo, M., Stover, S. & Fine, P. The relationship between sponsorship and rehabilitation outcome following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 27, 470–479 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1989.74
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1989.74