Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Recent achievements and conceptual challenges for urban digital twins

Urban digital twins hold immense promise as live computational models of cities, synthesizing diverse knowledge, streaming data, and supporting decisions towards more inclusive planning and policy. The size, heterogeneity, and open-ended character of cities, however, pose many difficult questions, at the frontiers of what is currently possible in computational science. Overcoming these challenges provides pathways for fundamental progress in the field and a proving ground for its economic value and social relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Weil, C., Bibri, S. E., Longchamp, R., Golay, F. & Alahi, A. Sustain. Cities Soc. 99, 104862 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferré-Bigorra, J., Casals, M. & Gangolells, M. Cities 131, 103905 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeddoub, I., Nys, G.-A., Hajji, R. & Billen, R. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 122, 103440 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, Y. Urban Computing (The MIT Press, 2018).

  5. Bettencourt, L. M. A. Introduction to Urban Science: Evidence and Theory of Cities as Complex Systems (The MIT Press, 2021).

  6. Bettencourt, L. M. A. Big Data 2, 12–22 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Batty, M. et al. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214, 481–518 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins (National Academies Press, 2023); https://doi.org/10.17226/26894

  9. Hayek, F. A. Am. Econ. Rev. 35, 519–530 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nagel, K., Beckman, R. & Barrett, C. TRANSIMS for urban planning. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (1999).

  11. Eubank, S. et al. Nature 429, 180–184 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett, C. L., Eubank, S. G. & Smith, J. P. Sci. Am. 292, 54–61 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yusta, J. M., Correa, G. J. & Lacal-Arántegui, R. Energy Pol 39, 6100–6119 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmidt, C. Nature 573, S58–S59 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bettencourt, L. M. A. & Ribeiro, R. M. PLoS ONE 3, e2185 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank C. Brelsford, C. Catlett, C. Ratti, and Y. Zheng for discussions. This work was partially supported by the Mansueto Institute for Urban Innovation at the University of Chicago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís M. A. Bettencourt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bettencourt, L.M.A. Recent achievements and conceptual challenges for urban digital twins. Nat Comput Sci 4, 150–153 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00604-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-024-00604-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics