Correction to: Palgrave Communications https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0404-9, published online 25 February 2020.

The original version of the paper included a mistake in Fig. 1 due to the captions for panels e and f being swapped.

The original panels read:

e Ratio between vertical and horizontal connections for all mazes. f Visual overlay of all mazes for each condition.

The correct order of the panels read:

e Visual overlay of all mazes for each condition. f Ratio between vertical and horizontal connections for all mazes.

This has been amended to both the online and PDF article file.