Abstract
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs). The protocol of the study was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42019157298).
Data sources
Seven electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, Unpublished Clinical Trials accessed through clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, LILACS, ProQuest Database, The Cochrane Library) were searched. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were hand searched.
Study selection
Clinical trials (RCT and CCT) that assessed the impact of the interventional use of mobile applications and social media among orthodontic patients were included. The review question was defined in PICO format as follows: population (P) = patients (no age restriction) undergoing orthodontic treatment using fixed, removable, or functional appliances, or patients in the retention phase that are wearing fixed or removable retainers; intervention (I) = mobile applications and social media-based interventions; comparison (C) = control group that did not receive any adjunctive intervention; outcome (O) = behavior changes in orthodontic patients after receipt of the intervention. Two authors independently conducted literature search from inception up to March 2021.
Data analysis
Social media-based interventions and mobile applications (or bespoke) were used in the form of reminders (WhatsApp reminders) and provision of information including YouTube videos and Instagram posts. Primary outcomes included adherence to wearing appliances or adjuncts, oral hygiene levels, oral health-related behaviors, periodontal outcomes, appointment attendance, knowledge, and related iatrogenic effects. Treatment-related experiences and patient-reported outcomes were assessed as secondary outcomes.
Results
16 studies (14 RCTs and 2 CCTs) were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which only 7 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). Results from meta-analyses showed that the intervention was favored in relation to gingival index (GI) (number of studies = 4, standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.35 to −0.28, P = 0.00, certainty of evidence = very low), plaque index (PI) (number of studies = 7, SMD = −0.91 [95% CI, −1.64 to −0.19], P = 0.01, certainty of evidence = very low), and bleeding index (BI) (number of studies = 4, SMD = −0.22 [95% CI, −0.50 to 0.05], P = 0.11, certainty of evidence = high). Sensitivity analysis was performed (including additional 3 studies for GI and 5 studies for PI), which also favored the intervention in relation to GI (number of studies = 7, SMD = −0.60 [95% CI, −1.01 to −0.18], P = 0.00, certainty of evidence = very low), and PI (number of studies = 12, SMD = −0.67 [95% CI, −1.14 to −0.19], P = 0.01, certainty of evidence = very low).
Conclusions
Limited evidence supports beneficial behavior change among orthodontic patients when using mobile applications or social media-based interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Fleming PS, Scott P, DiBiase AT. Compliance: getting the most from your orthodontic patients. Dent Update. 2007;34:565–66. 569-566, 572
Papadimitriou A, Kakali L, Pazera P, Doulis I, Kloukos D. Social media and orthodontic treatment from the patient’s perspective: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42:231–41.
Food and Drug Administration. Mobile medical applications: guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. https://www.c4tbh.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FDA-2015-Mobile-Medical-Applications.pdf.
Tiffany B, Blasi P, Catz SL, McClure JB. Mobile apps for oral health promotion: content review and heuristic usability analysis. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6:e11432.
Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e40.
Al-Moghrabi D, Colonio Salazar FB, Johal A, Fleming PS. Factors influencing adherence to vacuum-formed retainer wear: a qualitative study. J Orthod. 2019;46:212–9.
El-Huni A, Colonio Salazar FB, Sharma PK, Fleming PS. Understanding factors influencing compliance with removable functional appliances: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155:173–81.
Villanti AC, Johnson AL, Ilakkuvan V, Jacobs MA, Graham AL, Rath JM. Social media use and access to digital technology in US young adults in 2016. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e196.
Al-Moghrabi D, Alkadhimi A, Tsichlaki A, Pandis N, Fleming PS. The influence of mobile applications and social media-based interventions in producing behavior change among orthodontic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:338–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.09.009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ElNaghy, R., Al-Qawasmi, R. & Hasanin, M. Does using mobile applications and social media-based interventions induce beneficial behavioral changes among orthodontic patients?. Evid Based Dent 24, 26–27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00859-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00859-7
This article is cited by
-
Impact of malocclusions on oral health-related quality of life among adolescents
Evidence-Based Dentistry (2023)