Key points
Activity-based remuneration is a poor fit for promoting prevention.
Capitation-based contracts can align financial incentives to preventive aims.
There are financial, public service culture and evidence-based challenges that have presented obstacles to the adoption of a capitation system.
The right remuneration system is necessary but not sufficient to deliver prevention.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Department of Health and Social Security. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Unnecessary Dental Treatment. London: HMSO, 1986.
Birch S. Paying for prevention in clinical practice: Aligning provider remuneration with system objectives. BMC Oral Health 2015; DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S7.
Steele J. NHS Dental Services in England: An Independent Review Led by Professor Jimmy Steele. 2009.
UK Parliament. NHS Dentistry. 2023. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmhealth/964/report.html (accessed December 2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
King, T. Paying for prevention: the BDA view. Br Dent J 236, 107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-6764-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-6764-6