OBJECTIVE: We performed a cross sectional study at Edgardo Rebagliati Martins Hospital in 1997, including 238 mothers and their newborns whose birth weight was >2500gr and 40 mothers and their newborns (whose birth weight was≤ 2500gr. Our purpose was to determine whether maternal anthropometric characteristics were associated with the newborn birth weight.
MATERIAL and METHODS : We evaluated maternal data of (parity, intergenesic period, weight before pregnancy (WBP), weight, cefalic perimeter, body mass index, and weight gain during pregnancy (WGP)), paternal data (weight and height); and newborn data (sex, weight and height).
EPINFO6 statistical program was used to calculate means and standard deviation (SD) for the study variables in both groups. Results were compared by Z test for 2 independent populations. Correlation coefficients were tested with one tailed P-values of Student t to measure the significance of the association degree.
RESULTS : Mean WBP was less significant in the group with weight ≤2500g : 55.112 ± 7.313 vs 57.555 ± 9.1kg (p<0.05). The mean WGP was 9.67 ± 3.268 for the newborns whose weight was <2500gr, which was significantly less than 10.858 ± 4.692 for the newborn >2500gr. (p<0.05). The other variables did not yield significant differences, probably due to the small sample. Correlation coefficient for variables with respect respect to birth weight was r = 0.18 (p<0.005) for WBP and 0.17 (p<0.005) for WGP, which were the most significant.
CONCLUSION : These results confirm previous studies that showed WBP and WGP risk in pregnant mothers are the most sensitive nutritional indicators for low birth weight.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oliveros, M., Amemiya, I. Maternal Anthropometry and Newborn Weight. Pediatr Res 44, 810 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199811000-00029
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199811000-00029