Abstract
The fully allocated costs of hospital care from birth to final discharge were determined and compared to survivorship in two cohorts of <1500g birth weight infants. Study infants included all 500 to 1499g babies liveborn in Hamilton-Wentworth from 1964-69 and 1973-77 (before and after the introduction of the McMaster Regional Perinatal Program). Survivors numbered 157/376 (42%) and 251/416 (60%). For the ascertainment of costs, two random samples, stratified by birth weight and outcome, were selected: 77/376 infants (20%) and 83/416 (20%) from ′64-69 and ′73-77 respectively. Cohort costs in 1978 dollars amounted to $1299490 (′64-69) and $5800896 (′73-77). After making the cohorts equal in size, the following comparisons were made:
For the defined costs and effects the post NIC period is both more costly (by $4363163) and more effective (by 77.3 survivors) than the pre-NIC period, resulting in a cost of $56445 per additional survivor. In deciding whether NIC is a good health care investment, it is necessary to compare these results to comparably measured costs and effects from alternative programs offered by the health care system.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyle, M., Torrance, G., Horwood, S. et al. 37 COST EFFECTIVENESS OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE (NIC). Pediatr Res 15 (Suppl 4), 446 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-198104001-00046
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-198104001-00046