Abstract
Background:
Telephone consultations offer an efficient and effective option for the routine review of adults with symptomatic asthma. [Pinnock et al, BMJ 2003;326:477–9]
Objective:
To compare the cost-effectiveness of nurse-led reviews undertaken by telephone with face-to face reviews.
Methods:
Cost effectiveness analysis based on a 3 month randomised controlled trial of telephone vs face-to-face reviews for adults with asthma in 4 UK general practices. Data on use of direct healthcare resources (primary / secondary care contacts and drug use) were obtained from the GP records
Results:
278 asthmatics were randomised to surgery (S: n=141) or telephone (T: n=137) review. 101 (74%) asthmatics in the telephone group were reviewed vs 68 (48%) in the surgery group (p<0.001). Telephone consultations were significantly shorter (mean duration T: 11.19 (SD 4.79) vs S: 21.87 (SD 6.85) minutes (p<0.001) Healthcare costs per patient over 3 months were similar (S: £59.22 (SD 66.00) vs T: £64.20 (SD 73.15) p=0.551) Total cost, based on unit costs for nurse clinic consultations in 2000/1 (www.pssru_library@ukc.ac.uk) plus the cost of telephone calls (www.BT.com) of providing 101 telephone and 68 face-to-face reviews was similar (T: £724.20 vs S: £697.60) but mean healthcare cost per consultation achieved was less in the telephone arm (T: £10.65 vs S: £6.91)
Conclusion:
Telephone consultations enabled a greater proportion of asthma patients to be reviewed (risk difference=26%) with cost savings to the NHS. This mode of delivering care is, therefore, a dominant strategy which not only improves access but reduces cost per consultation
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinnock, H. Cost effectiveness of providing nurse led annual asthma reviews by telephonevs face to face: a randomised controlled trial in UK primary care. Prim Care Respir J 12, 62 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2003.22
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pcrj.2003.22