Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

A forward-genetic approach for analysis of the immune system

Key Points

  • The identification of all mammalian genes through genome sequencing creates the possibility of understanding immune development and function in the context of the whole genome.

  • Forward-genetic strategies allow the assigning of function to gene products without previous knowledge of gene activity or expression. Importantly, many types of mutation might be uncovered, including, but not only, null alleles.

  • Chemical mutagenesis using n-ethylnitrosourea (ENU) is a robust and proven method for generating mutant animals with various immunological and other traits of interest.

  • Technological changes have made positional cloning a practical and rapid method for gene identification, including single base-pair mutations.

  • Numerous developmental and functional mutations have been identified from ENU-based screening programmes, in some cases with unexpected associations of gene and function.

  • Further exploitation of forward-genetic technologies will depend largely on the ability to screen for phenotype and function in the context of the whole animal.

Abstract

The completion of the genome sequences of both humans and mice challenges biologists to determine gene function on a vast, whole-organism scale. Both phenotype-based ('forward') and gene-based ('reverse') strategies are being developed to approach this issue. Forward-genetic approaches, however, provide the unique ability of assigning function to genes in an unbiased, global manner that is independent of previous assumptions about gene function. In this article, we compare various genetic technologies for their potential role in dissecting immune-system development and function, with particular emphasis on the worldwide efforts that use chemical mutagenesis as a forward-genetic strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A representative breeding scheme for ENU mutagenesis.
Figure 2: Mapping of ENU-induced mutations.
Figure 3: Genetic identification of ENU-induced mutations.
Figure 4: Screening assay design for ENU-mutagenesis programmes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russ, A. et al. Random mutagenesis in the mouse as a tool in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 7, 1175–1183 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Samelson, L. E. Signal transduction mediated by the T cell antigen receptor: the role of adapter proteins. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 371–394 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Koretzky, G. A. & Myung, P. S. Positive and negative regulation of T-cell activation by adaptor proteins. Nature Rev. Immunol. 1, 95–107 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadeau, J. H. et al. Sequence interpretation. Functional annotation of mouse genome sequences. Science 291, 1251–1255 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Perkins, A. S. Functional genomics in the mouse. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2, 81–91 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer, B. Inducible gene targeting in mice using the Cre/lox system. Methods 14, 381–392 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zinkernagel, R. M. & Doherty, P. C. The discovery of MHC restriction. Immunol. Today 18, 14–17 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy, K. M. & Reiner, S. L. The lineage decisions of helper T cells. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2, 933–944 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, S. D. & Peters, J. Combining mutagenesis and genomics in the mouse-closing the phenotype gap. Trends Genet. 12, 433–435 (1996). This paper introduces the concept of the 'phenotype gap' — the disparity between the available mouse mutant resource and the range of additional phenotypes that are required to fully exploit the mouse as a model of human disease.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koonin, E. V., Wolf, Y. I. & Karev, G. P. The structure of the protein universe and genome evolution. Nature 420, 218–223 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Samelson, L. E. Lymphocyte activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2, 210–214 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klinghoffer, R. A., Hamilton, T. G., Hoch, R. & Soriano, P. An allelic series at the PDGFαR locus indicates unequal contributions of distinct signaling pathways during development. Dev. Cell 2, 103–113 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vivian, J. L., Chen, Y., Yee, D., Schneider, E. & Magnuson, T. An allelic series of mutations in Smad2 and Smad4 identified in a genotype-based screen of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea-mutagenized mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15542–15547 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perrimon, N. Signalling pathways initiated by receptor protein tyrosine kinases in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 260–266 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kornfeld, K. Vulval development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Trends Genet. 13, 55–61 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nolan, P. M. et al. A systematic, genome-wide, phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nature Genet. 25, 440–443 (2000). An excellent overview of one of the first two large-scale programmes that use ethylnitrosourea (ENU).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loy, A. L. & Goodnow, C. C. Novel approaches for identifying genes regulating lymphocyte development and function. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14, 260–265 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hrabe de Angelis, M. H. et al. Genome-wide, large-scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nature Genet. 25, 444–447 (2000). An overview of the pioneering ENU-mutagenesis programme carried out as part of the German Human Genome Project. It accompanies reference 17, which describes a corresponding effort carried out in the United Kingdom.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noveroske, J. K., Weber, J. S. & Justice, M. J. The mutagenic action of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in the mouse. Mamm. Genome 11, 478–483 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Justice, M. J. et al. Effects of ENU dosage on mouse strains. Mamm. Genome 11, 484–488 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Russell, W. L. et al. Specific-locus test shows ethylnitrosourea to be the most potent mutagen in the mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5818–5819 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flaswinkel, H. et al. Identification of immunological relevant phenotypes in ENU mutagenized mice. Mamm. Genome 11, 526–527 (2000). The first description of a large-scale ENU screen for mutations that affect the development of the immune system. This entire volume of Mammalian Genome is devoted to ENU mutagenesis.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelms, K. A. & Goodnow, C. C. Genome-wide ENU mutagenesis to reveal immune regulators. Immunity 15, 409–418 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Beier, D. R. ENU mutagenesis: a work in progress. Physiol. Genomics 11, 111–113 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miosge, L. A., Blasioli, J., Blery, M. & Goodnow, C. C. Analysis of an ethylnitrosourea-generated mouse mutation defines a cell intrinsic role of nuclear factor κB2 in regulating circulating B cell numbers. J. Exp. Med. 196, 1113–1119 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fujimoto, Y. et al. CD83 expression influences CD4+ T cell development in the thymus. Cell 108, 755–767 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryding, A. D., Sharp, M. G. & Mullins, J. J. Conditional transgenic technologies. J. Endocrinol. 171, 1–14 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank M. Brunkow, G. Carlson and the Celltech ENU team.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Ramsdell.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

LocusLink

CD4

CD83

LAT

Rag2

FURTHER INFORMATION

Mouse genome informatics website

Glossary

CRE–LOX TECHNOLOGY

A site-specific recombination system that is used to delete a gene in mouse cells using Cre recombinase. Two short DNA sequences (LoxP sites) are engineered to flank the target DNA. Expression of Cre recombinase leads to excision of the intervening sequence. Depending on the type of promoter, Cre can be expressed at specific times during development or by specific sets of cells, including embryonic stem cells.

SINGLE TANDEM REPEATS AND SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS

(STRs and SNPs). A short series of DNA sequences (STRs) or single base-pair changes (SNPs) that are inherited in a Mendelian manner. Approximately three to six million SNPs are thought to exist in the mammalian genome and a variety of techniques are available for their specific detection.

PHENODEVIANT

An animal that has a property or response outside the normal distribution for the other animals of the same pedigree. Phenodeviant animals are often presumed to result from the mutation of a specific gene, but this must be confirmed by gene identification.

EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG DATABASE

(EST database). A database (public or private) that catalogues genes that are presumed to be expressed at the RNA level in a particular cell type or tissue.

NON-OBESE DIABETIC MICE

(NOD mice). An inbred strain of mice that spontaneously develops T-cell-mediated autoimmune diabetes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Appleby, M., Ramsdell, F. A forward-genetic approach for analysis of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 3, 463–471 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1109

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1109

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing