Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Neurotrophin-4 mediated TrkB activation reinforces morphine-induced analgesia

Abstract

Morphine is a powerful analgesic for severe pain, and this effect is thought to be mediated by inhibitory G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here we show that morphine activates TrkB in a NT-4–dependent manner and provide evidence from transgenic mice that such activation partially mediates morphine-induced analgesia. These findings show that the anti-nociceptive effect of morphine is partially mediated by NT-4–induced TrkB receptor activation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Morphine induces tyrosine phosphorylation of the TrkB receptor.
Figure 2: Antinociceptive responses to morphine in several mutant mice and potentiation of morphine analgesia by TrkB activation in wild-type mice.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Law, P.Y., Wong, Y.H. & Loh, H.H. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 40, 389–430 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luttrell, L.M., Daaka, Y. & Lefkowitz, R.J. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 177–183 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, F.S. & Chao, M.V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3555–3560 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McLaughlin, J.P. & Chavkin, C. Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 1360–1368 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Appleyard, S.M., McLaughlin, J.P. & Chavkin, C. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38281–38285 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan, Q. et al. J. Comp. Neurol. 378, 135–157 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, Y.Q., Kaneko, T., Nomura, S. & Mizuno, N. J. Comp. Neurol. 367, 375–402 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Middlemas, D.S., Meisenhelder, J. & Hunter, T. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5458–5466 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guiton, M., Gunn-Moore, F.J. & Tavare, J.M. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 23, 176S (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Segal, R.A. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20175–20181 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patapoutian, A. & Reichardt, L.F. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 272–280 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saarelainen, T. et al. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 16, 87–96 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Minichiello, L. et al. Neuron 21, 335–345 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siuciak, J.A., Altar, C.A., Wiegand, S.J. & Lindsay, R.M. Brain Res. 633, 326–330 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Kaplan for TrkB antibody and M. Malcangio for advice on NT-4 release assay. Supported by Biotechnology Program of the EU QLG3-1999-00602, Swedish Medical Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society and Göran Gustafssons Foundation (P.E.); fellowship from David and Astrid Hageléns Foundation (G.L.); Academy of Finland, TEKES and Sigrid Juselius Foundation (E.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrik Ernfors.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Morphine induced phosphoTrk immunoreactivity in brainstem nuclei. Confocal images of the trigeminal spinal nucleus and locus coeruleus (insets) neurons stained with anti-Trk autophosphorylation antibody 30 min after (a) morphine (10 mg/kg), (b) morphine (10 mg/kg) followed by naloxone (1 mg/kg), and (c) naloxone alone. Note increased immunoreactivity in morphine but not morphine plus naloxone or naloxone treated mice. Arrows indicate phospho-Trk positive cells in the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Scale bar, 200 μm for the trigeminal spinal nucleus and 75 μm for the locus coeruleus. Methods: C57/BL6 mice were treated with morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.; n = 3), or with morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) followed by naloxone (1 mg/kg, i.p. n = 2) 10 min later, or only naloxone (1 mg/kg, i.p. n = 1). Thirty minutes after morphine treatment or 10 min after naloxone administration, mice were anesthetized by isoflurane (5% [v/v%] in 70% N2O and 30% O2) and transcardially perfused with ice-cold physiological saline (15 ml) that was followed by 80 ml of fixative composed of 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutaraldehyde and 1mM sodium orthovanadate in sodium phosphate buffer (PB, 0.1M, pH 7.4) at a flow rate of 4 - 4.5 ml/min. Whole brains were removed from the skulls and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 1mM sodium orthovanadate in PB overnight. Brains were then cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in physiological saline for 24 hrs, cryostat sectioned at a 40-μm thickness, and collected in 0.1M PB with 0.1% Na-azide as preservative. Series of free-floating sections of all animals were processed simultaneously in a uniform manner. After extensive rinsing in PB, sections were pre-incubated in a mixture of 10% normal donkey serum (NDS, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA), 5% normal bovine serum (BSA) and 0.1% triton X-100 in PB for 60 min. Subsequently, sections were exposed to the primary antibody rabbit anti-Tyr674,Tyr675-phosphorylated tyrosine kinase (1:25; Calbiochem, USA) in PB containing 1% NDS, 0.1% BSA and 0.1% triton X-100 for 48 hrs at 4 °C under continuous agitation of the incubation medium. Thereafter, sections were washed in repeated changes of PB and incubated with carbocyanine 3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:200; affinity-pure for multiple labeling without cross-reactivity with mouse serum proteins, Jackson) in PB containing 2% BSA for 2 hrs at room temperature. Next, sections were rinsed in PB, dipped in distilled water and mounted on fluorescence-free glasses. Sections were coverslipped using Entellan (in toluene). Sections were analyzed using confocal laser-scanning microscopy with appropriate excitation and emission filters (543 nm and 560-610 nm, respectively; Zeiss 510, Germany). Selected images were captured using identical pinhole, detector gain, detector offset, amplification gain and scanning control settings, where specimen of morphine-treated animals were used for calibration of scanning conditions. Subsequently, multi-panel plates of unmodified images were created employing Paint Shop Pro (v. 7.01, Jasc Inc., USA) and Adobe Photoshop (v. 6.0, Adobe Inc., USA). Scanning data: pinhole: 60 μm, (less than 1.9 micrometer optical slice), adjusted for even light distribution. Detector gain: 960; offset: -0.3; amplificator gain: 1; 100% laser excitation on 543 nm channel; speed: 7, lines: 4; zoom: (spinal trigeminal nucleus images): 1, Locus coeruleus images: 1.5. (JPG 48 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Measurements of morphine and morphine metabolites in the plasma of NT-4-/- and NT-4+/+ mice. Mice were decapitated 30 minutes after morphine administration (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and blood samples (300 μl) collected in ice-chilled tubes containing heparin (10 IU/ml) were centrifuged for separation of the plasma. Morphine (a), Morphine-6-glucuronide (b), and Morphine-3 glucuronide (c) were measured by a reverse phase HPLC column (C18, Spherisorb S3 ODS2 100 x 4 mm I.D.; 3 μm particles) and no difference was observed between wild-type (n = 5) and NT-4-/- (n = 6) mice (Student t-test). This shows that the difference in morphine response between mutated mice and wild-type mice is not caused by a difference in metabolisation of morphine. (JPG 34 kb)

Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 40 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lucas, G., Hendolin, P., Harkany, T. et al. Neurotrophin-4 mediated TrkB activation reinforces morphine-induced analgesia. Nat Neurosci 6, 221–222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1021

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing