Nature Materials 4, 518–524 (2005) doi: 10.1038/nmat1421
In this Progress Article, the caption for Figure 6 was incorrect; the correct wording is below.
Figure 6 Cartilage regeneration by chondrocyte delivery on designed Bioplotter-fabricated PEG/PBT scaffolds is superior to PEG/PBT scaffolds made by porogen leaching. a, PEG/PBT scaffold fabricated by porogen leaching. b, Bioplotter-fabricated PEG/PBT scaffold. c, Cartilage matrix (red areas) generation in Bioplotter scaffold after 21 days in a mouse. Insert shows scaffold implanted without chondrocytes. d, Cartilage matrix (red area) generation after 21 days in scaffold made by porogen leaching. Insert shows control scaffold implanted without chondrocytes. Reprinted from ref. 60. Copyright (2005), with permission from Elsevier.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nmat1421
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hollister, S. Erratum: Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Mater 5, 590 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1683
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1683
This article is cited by
-
Biocompatible Scaffold Based on Silk Fibroin for Tissue Engineering Applications
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C (2023)
-
Design, optimization, and selective laser melting of vin tiles cellular structure-based hip implant
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2021)
-
Design, optimization, and validation of mechanical properties of different cellular structures for biomedical application
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (2020)
-
Preparation and characterization of dithiol-modified graphene oxide nanosheets reinforced alginate nanocomposite as bone scaffold
SN Applied Sciences (2019)