Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

The chronic debate over Lyme disease

A small group of doctors—and a large number of patients—say Lyme disease can sometimes manifest as a chronic illness, one that evades conventional medical tests and treatments. The physicians who support this theory flout standard medical guidelines and treat patients with long-term antibiotic therapies that mainstream researchers say are unproven and potentially dangerous. Coco Ballantyne reports on how the controversy over Lyme disease has become increasing polarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lyons, A.J. & Robertson, H.D. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26844–26850; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steere, A.C., Broderick, T.F. & Malawista, S.E. Am. J. Epidemiol. 108, 312–321; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgdorfer, W. et al. Science 216, 1317–1319; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Margos, G. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 8730–8735; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vannier, E., Gewurz, B.E. & Krause, P.J. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 3, 469–488; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brorson, O. & Brorson, S.H. Infection 25, 240–246; 1997; Alban, P.S., Johnson, P.W. & Nelson, D.R. Microbiology 146, 119–127; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips, S.E., Mattman, L.H., Hulínská, D. & Moayad, H. Infection 26, 364–367; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feder, H.M. Jr. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1422–1430; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wormser, G.P. et al. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 1089–1134; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aggarwal VR, et al. Int. J. Epidemiol. 35, 468–476; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fallon, B.A. et al. Neurology 70, 992–1003; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krupp L.B. et al. Neurology 60, 1923–1930; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marques, A. Infect. Dis. Clin. North. Am. 2, 341–360; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rothstein, J.D. et al. Nature 433, 73–77; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bowie, W.R. Drugs 67, 2661–2666; 2007; Feder, H.M. Jr. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1422–1430; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hodzic, E. et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 1728–1736; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qiu, W.G. et al. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 1097–1104; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh, G. et al. Am. J. Pathol., doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080483; 2008.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

The chronic debate over Lyme disease. Nat Med 14, 1135–1139 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1108-1135

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1108-1135

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing