Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Point mutations in the c–Myc transactivation domain are common in Burkitt's lymphoma and mouse plasmacytomas

Abstract

We have screened the entire coding region of c–myc in a panel of Burkitt's lymphomas (BLs) and mouse plasmacytomas (PCTs). Contrary to the belief that c–myc is wild type in these tumours, we found that 65% of 57 BLs and 30% of 10 PCTs tested exhibit at least one amino acid (aa) substitution. These mutations were apparently homozygous in all BL cell lines tested and two tumour biopsies, implying that the mutations often occur before Myc/lg translocation in BL. In PCTs, only the mutant c–myc allele was expressed indicating a functional homozygosity, but occurrence of mutations after the translocation. Many of the observed mutations are clustered in regions associated with transcriptional activation and apoptosis, and in BLs, they frequently occur at sites of phosphorylation, suggesting that the mutations have a pathogenetic role.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcu, K.B., Bossone, S.A. & Patel, A.J. Myc function and regulation. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 61, 809–860 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prendergast, G.C. & Ziff, E.B. A new bind for myc. Trends Genet. 8, 91–96 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Depinho, R.A., Schreiber-Agus, N. & Alt, F.W. Myc family oncogenes in the development of normal and neoplastic cells. Adv. cancer Res. 57, 1–46 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole, M. The myc oncogene: its role in transformation and differentiation. Adv. cancer Res. 20, 361–384 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Potter, M. & Wiener, F. Plasmacytomagenesis in mice: model; model of neoplastic development dependent upon chromosomal translocations. Carcinogenesis 13, 1681–1697 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Magrath, I. The pathogenesis of Burkitt's lymphoma. Adv. cancer Res. 55, 133–270 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Evan, G.I. et al. Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c–Myc protein. Cell 69, 119–128 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wyllie, A.H. et al. Rodent fibroblast tumours expressing human myc and ras genes: growth, metastasis and endogenous oncogene expression. Br. J. Cancer 56, 251–259 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Askew, D., Ashmun, R., Simmons, B. & Cleveland, J. Constitutive c–myc expression in IL–3 dependent myeloid cell line suppresses cycle arrest and accelerates apoptosis. Oncogene 6, 1915–1922 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi, Y. et al. Role for c–myc in activation-induced apoptotic cell death in T cell hybridomas. Science 257, 212–214 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Magrath, I., Jain, V. & Bhatia, K. Epstein-Barr virus and Burkitt's lymphoma. Sem. Cancer Biol. 3, 285–295 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabbitts, T.H., Hamlyn, R.H. & Baer, R. Altered nucleotide sequences of a translocated c–myc gene in Burkitt lymphoma. Nature 306, 760–765 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabbitts, T.H., Forster, A., Hamlyn, P. & Baer, R. Effect of somatic mutations within translocated c–myc genes in Burkitt lymphoma. Nature 309, 592–597 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Legouy, E. et al. Structure and expression of the murine L–myc gene. The EMBO J. 6, 3359–3366 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta, S., Seth, A. & Davis, R.J. Transactivation of gene expression by Myc is inhibited by mutation at the phosphorylation sites Thr–58 and Ser–62. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 3216–3220 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu, W., Cechova, K., Tassi, V. & Dalla-Favera, R. Opposite regulation of gene transcription and cell proliferation by c–Myc and Max. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 2935–2939 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Seth, A., Alvarez, E., Gupta, S. & Davis, R.J. A phosphorylation site located in the NH2-terminal domain of c–Myc increases transactivation of gene expression. J. biol. Chem. 266, 23521–23524 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Potter, M. et al. Avian v–myc replaces chromosomal translocation in murine plasmacytomagenesis. Science 235, 787–789 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cory, S. Activation of cellular oncogenes in hemopoietic cells by chromosome translocation. Adv. cancer Res. 47, 189–234 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suen, T.-C. & Hung, M.-C. & Hung, M.-C. c–myc reverses neu-induced transformed morphology by transcriptional repression. Molec. cell. Biol. 11, 354–362 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhatia, K., Huppi, K., Spangler, G. et al. Point mutations in the c–Myc transactivation domain are common in Burkitt's lymphoma and mouse plasmacytomas. Nat Genet 5, 56–61 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0993-56

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0993-56

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing