Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Effect of Muscle Stretching on Tension Development and Mechanical Threshold during Contractures

Nature New Biology volume 246, pages 221–222 (1973)Cite this article

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 March 1974

This article has been updated

Abstract

STRETCHING a muscle over its resting length produces changes in its performance during activation. These changes can be reflected as an increment in the peak tension and in duration of the twitch or both1–8; in the lower rate of stimulation necessary to produce maximal tetanic tension8, 9; in the tension developed by skinned fibres10 or in the ability to produce more work after the stretch2. It has been found that stretching produces an increase in oxygen consumption11 or heat production12, and several explanations have been given. It has been proposed, for example, that the stretch effect is due to increased activity of the Na pump13, or to an increase in the Na+ concentration in the cytoplasm12 or simply due to a positive feedback effect5, 8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

References

  1. Hartree, W., and Hill, A. V., J. Physiol. Lond., 55, 389 (1921).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbot, B. C., and Aubert, X., J. Physiol. Lond., 177, 77 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jewell, B. R., and Wilkie, D. R., J. Physiol. Lond., 152, 30 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buller, A. J., Eccles, J. C., and Eccles, R. M., J. Physiol. Lond., 150, 399 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill, A. V., Proc. R. Soc., 159, 589 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Close, R., J. Physiol. Lond., 173, 74 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavagna, G. A., Dusman, B., and Margaria, R., Proc. XXIV Intern. Congr. Physiol., 78 (Washington, DC, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rack, P. M. H., and Westbury, D. R., J. Physiol. Lond., 209, 443 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthews, P. B. C., J. Physiol. Lond., 147, 521 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Endo, M., Nature new Biol., 237, 211 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, T. P., J. Physiol. Lond., 74, 441 (1932).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clinch, N. F., J. Physiol. Lond., 196, 397 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris, E. J., J. Physiol. Lond., 124, 242 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalez-Serratos, H., Valle, R., and Cillero, A., Bol. Est. Med. Biol., 27, 319 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Serratos, H., Valle, R., and Cillero, A., Proc. XXV Intern. Congr. Physiol. IX, 211 (1971).

  16. Hodgkin, A., and Horowicz, P., J. Physiol. Lond., 148, 127 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon, A. M., Huxley, A. F., and Julian, F. J., J. Physiol. Lond., 184, 170 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huxley, A. F., and Peachey, L. D., J. Physiol. Lond., 156, 150 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ling, G., and Gerard, R. W., J. cell comp. Physiol., 34, 397 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Frank, G. B., J. Physiol. Lond., 163, 254 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hodgkin, A., and Horowicz, P., J. Physiol. Lond., 153, 386 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Edman, K. A., and Kiessling, A., Acta physiol. scand., 81, 182 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. H. GONZALEZ-SERRATOS

    Present address: Department of Physiology, University of Rochester, School of Medicine, 260 Crittenden Boulevard, Rochester, New York, 14642

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, Centro de Investigacion del l.P.N., Ap. Post 14–740, Mexico, 14

    H. GONZALEZ-SERRATOS, R. VALLE & A. CILLERO

Authors
  1. H. GONZALEZ-SERRATOS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. VALLE
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. CILLERO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GONZALEZ-SERRATOS, H., VALLE, R. & CILLERO, A. Effect of Muscle Stretching on Tension Development and Mechanical Threshold during Contractures. Nature New Biology 246, 221–222 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio246221a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio246221a0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing