Abstract
DASTOLI and Price1 have found a protein fraction in bovine tongue extracts that complexes with sugars and saccharin and has some of the properties expected of the sweet taste receptor molecule. A similar protein fraction has also been demonstrated in 0.4–0.6% saturation (NH4)2SO4 fraction of extract from rat tongue, but not in extract from cat tongue, which has little sensitivity to sugars2. Also, the order and the relative magnitude of effectiveness of nine sugars on the fraction of extract from rat tongue epithelium, shown by measuring changes in ultraviolet absorbancy of the protein complex with sugars, agree with those obtained electrophysiologically in the rat3. On the other hand, Koyama and Kurihara4, after comparing the protein pattern obtained from papillae with taste buds with those from the surrounding epithelium, concluded that a unique protein was not present in taste buds in the bovine tongue. Their inability to find any difference in the protein pattern between extracts from the two kinds of papillae may be due to the minute amount of the specific protein in the taste buds, because their results are not compatible with the finding that suspensions of circumvallate and fungiform papillae bound more 14C-labelled sucrose than did those from filiform papillae, which are devoid of taste buds5. The presence of a minute amount of the sugar-binding protein has been demonstrated at the anodal side of the disc electrophoresis of 0.4–0.6% saturation (NH4)2SO4 fraction of extract from rat tongue epithelium6. This sugar-binding protein band was stained by amido black or Coomsian bright and showed a high radioactivity after 14C-fructose had been added to the fraction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Dastoli, F. R., and Price, S., Science, 154, 905 (1966).
Hiji, Y., Kobayashi, N., and Sato, M., Kumamoto Med. J., 21, 137 (1968).
Hiji, Y., Kobayashi, N., and Sato, M., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 39B, 367 (1971).
Koyama, N., and Kurihara, K., J. Gen. Physiol., 57, 297 (1971).
Morris, J. A., and Cagan, R. H., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 261, 114 (1972).
Hiji, Y., and Sato, M., in Olfaction and Taste (edit. by Schneider, D.), 4, 221 (Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1972).
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265 (1951).
Guth, L., Anat. Rec., 128, 715 (1957).
Dastoli, F. R., Lopiekes, D. V., and Price, S., Biochemistry, 7, 1160 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HIJI, Y., SATO, M. Isolation of the Sugar-binding Protein from Rat Taste Buds. Nature New Biology 244, 91–93 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio244091a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio244091a0
This article is cited by
-
Some SAR studies on the sense of taste
Carlsberg Research Communications (1984)
-
Selective elimination of taste responses to sugars by proteolytic enzymes
Nature (1975)
-
Autosomal recessive mutation in sugar response of Drosophila
Nature (1974)