Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Effect of Ploidy and Mutagens on Bromodeoxyuridine Resistance in Haploid and Diploid Frog Cells

Abstract

THE frog embryo cell line ICR 2A is the first established haploid vertebrate cell line1. In haploid cells recessive mutations should be detectable at a frequency 106 to 109 times greater than expected in diploid cells; mutagen treatment should increase the yield further. These predictions are useful to test whether variants arising in culture are the result of gene mutation. To apply this test to frog cells, mutations for thymidine kinase were sought. Such mutants were first obtained by exposing mouse L cells to the thymidine analogue 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR); a loss of thymidine kinase activity prevented the lethal incorporation of BUdR into DNA2. The new phenotype was considered to be the result of gene mutation because of its heritability and eventually because of data from Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analyses3 (a test of the spontaneity or non-inducibility of a process, not its cause). The question of origin was further complicated by a number of factors: (1) the necessity of a long, repeated, exposure to BUdR2; (2) the high mutation rate (up to 10−3) compared with bacterial mutants (10−910−6)4,5; and (3) the presence of resistant clones with intermediate enzyme levels4,5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Freed, J. J., and Mezger-Freed, L., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 65, 337 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kit, S., Dubbs, D. R., Piekarski, L. J., and Hsu, T. C., Exp. Cell Res., 31, 297 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luria, S. E., and Delbrück, M., Genetics, 28, 491 (1943).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Littlefield, J. W., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 95, 14 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Breslow, R. E., and Goldsby, R. A., Exp. Cell Res., 55, 339 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Freed, J. J., and Mezger-Freed, L., in Methods in Cell Physiology (edit. by Presott, D. M.), 4, 19 (Academic Press, New York, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mezger-Freed, L., Sooy, L. E., and Freed, J. J., J. Cell Biol., 47, 139a (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mezger-Freed, L., J. Cell Biol, (in the press).

  9. Straus, N. A., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 68, 799 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MEZGER-FREED, L. Effect of Ploidy and Mutagens on Bromodeoxyuridine Resistance in Haploid and Diploid Frog Cells. Nature New Biology 235, 245–246 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio235245a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio235245a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing