Abstract
Background A 58-year-old man, without any personal or familial risk factors for prostate cancer, visited his primary care physician for a first routine prostate cancer screening with a serum PSA test.
Investigations Serum PSA test, digital rectal examination, prostate biopsy and pathological analysis, repeat serum PSA tests and pathological re-evaluation, abdominal tomodensitometry, whole-body bone scan and prostatic MRI.
Diagnosis Highly elevated serum PSA indicative of advanced prostate cancer at high risk for metastasis.
Management The patient was started on androgen deprivation therapy with goserelin acetate and bicalutamide. At 3 months, he was asymptomatic, his prostate was atrophic on digital rectal examination and he had suppressed serum testosterone. However, his serum PSA level remained highly elevated in the absence of any radiographic evidence of advanced cancer. A repeat PSA test using a different assay returned a negligible PSA concentration; evaluation with blocker agents revealed the presence of heterophilic antibody interference with the original PSA assay. The patient was rediagnosed as having a likely low-grade prostate adenocarcinoma; androgen deprivation therapy was stopped, and he was deemed a candidate for watchful waiting. At 15 months, his serum PSA level remained stable at a low level, and prostatic dynamic MRI showed no sign of tumor in the prostate or in the pelvis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Villers A et al. (2003) Summary of the standards, options and recommendations for the management of patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (2001). Br J Cancer 89 (Suppl 1): S50–S58
Partin AW et al. (2001) Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. Urology 58: 843–848
D'Amico AV et al. (1998) The combination of preoperative prostate specific antigen and postoperative pathological findings to predict prostate specific antigen outcome in clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 160: 2096–2101
Rotmensch S and Cole LA (2000) False diagnosis and needless therapy of presumed malignant disease in women with false-positive human chorionic gonadotropin concentrations. Lancet 355: 712–715
Ward G et al. (1997) Heterophilic antibodies remain a problem for the immunoassay laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 108: 417–421
Weber TH et al. (1990) Endogenous interference in immunoassays in clinical chemistry: a review. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 201: 77–82
Hunter WM and Budd PS (1980) Circulating antibodies to ovine and bovine immunoglobulin in healthy subjects: a hazard for immunoassays. Lancet 2: 1136
Levinson SS and Miller JJ (2002) Towards a better understanding of heterophile (and the like) antibody interference with modern immunoassays. Clin Chim Acta 325: 1–15
Ismail AA (2005) A radical approach is needed to eliminate interference from endogenous antibodies in immunoassays. Clin Chem 51: 25–26
Trojan A et al. (2004) False-positive human serum chorionic gonadotropin in a patient with a history of germ cell cancer. Oncology 66: 336–338
Sturgeon CM et al. (2008) National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in clinical practice: quality requirements. Clin Chem 54: e1–e10
Safa AA et al. (1998) Undetectable serum prostate-specific antigen associated with metastatic prostate cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 21: 323–326
Morgan BR and Tarter TH (2001) Serum heterophilic antibodies interfere with prostate specific antigen test and result in over treatment in a patient with prostate cancer. J Urol 166: 2311–2312
Camacho T et al. (2002) Falsely increased prostate-specific antigen concentration attributed to heterophilic antibodies. Ann Clin Biochem 39: 160–161
Berglund RK et al. (2008) Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance. J Urol 180: 1964–1967
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henry, N., Sebe, P. & Cussenot, O. Inappropriate treatment of prostate cancer caused by heterophilic antibody interference. Nat Rev Urol 6, 164–167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1317
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1317