Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Are adverse outcomes associated with assisted reproduction related to the technology or couples' subfertility?

Abstract

This commentary discusses a paper by Romundstad and colleagues, who aimed to determine whether the adverse affects associated with assisted reproduction are a result of the technology or couples' infertility. The study used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from January 1984 to June 2006, and analyzed the outcomes of the whole population, and of sibling pairs where one sibling was conceived by assisted reproduction, and the other by spontaneous conception. The study showed that in the whole population, babies conceived via assisted reproduction experienced more adverse events than babies conceived via spontaneous conception. Among the sibling pairs, however, assisted reproduction was not associated with increased risk of low birth weight, premature delivery, small size for gestational age, or perinatal mortality. The results indicate that the adverse outcomes associated with assisted fertilization could be attributable to factors that lead to infertility and subfertility, rather than the reproductive technology. Follow-up studies should be performed to identify genes or other factors that lead to high risks of adverse events among subfertile couples, and these couples should be counselled about the increased risk of adverse events during and after pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Helmerhorst FM et al. (2004) Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 328: 261–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson RA et al. (2004) Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 103: 551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sutcliffe AG and Ludwig M (2007) Outcome of assisted reproduction. Lancet 370: 351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen M et al. (2005) Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects—a systematic review. Hum Reprod 20: 328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horsthemke B and Ludwig M (2005) Assisted reproduction: the epigenetic perspective. Hum Reprod Update 11: 473–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig M et al. (2005) Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples. J Med Genet 42: 289–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Romundstad LB et al. (2008) Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 372: 737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, M. Are adverse outcomes associated with assisted reproduction related to the technology or couples' subfertility?. Nat Rev Urol 6, 8–9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1272

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1272

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing