Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Is the Sonolith Vision fourth-generation lithotripter effective for the treatment of renal calculi?

Nature Clinical Practice Urology volume 5, pages 300–301 (2008)Cite this article

Nomikos MS et al. (2007) Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison? BJU Int 100: 1356–1360

Background

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Lingeman JE et al. (1989) Bioeffects and long-term effects of ESWL. In Urinary Calculi: ESWL, Endourology, and Medical Therapy, 285 (Eds Smith LH et al.) Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger

    Google Scholar 

  2. Drach GW et al. (1986) Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 135: 1127–1133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lingeman JE et al. (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the Methodist Hospital of Indiana experience. J Urol 135: 1134–1137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lingeman JE and Zafar FS (1996) Lithotripsy systems. In Smith's Textbook of Endourology, 581 (Ed. Smith AD) St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pettersson B et al. (1989) Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy without anesthesia using a Dornier HM3 lithotriptor without technical modifications. J Urol 142: 1189–1192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clayman RV (2008) Untipped: an endourologist's lament (with apologies to Pete Seeger). J Urol 179: 402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The synopsis was written by Rachel Murphy, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, 1801 North Senate Blvd, Suite 220, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA jlingeman@clarian.org

Authors and Affiliations

  1. JE Lingeman is Director of Research at the Methodist Hospital Institute for Kidney Stone Disease, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,

    James E Lingeman

Authors
  1. James E Lingeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lingeman, J. Is the Sonolith Vision fourth-generation lithotripter effective for the treatment of renal calculi?. Nat Rev Urol 5, 300–301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1112

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing