Paul R et al. (2004) Influence of transrectal ultrasound probe on prostate cancer detection in transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsy of prostate. Urology 64: 532–536
Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy is a widely accepted procedure in prostate cancer diagnosis, although little is known about the effects on the detection rate of different types of ultrasound equipment. Paul et al. hypothesized that end-fire ultrasound probes, which facilitate sampling in the most lateral part of the peripheral zone, would be superior to side-fire probes in the detection of smaller tumors. Their retrospective study comparing these two types of probe has recently been published.
A total of 2,625 patients underwent a first-time, systematic sextant biopsy using the Kretz Combisone side-fire probe, the Bruel & Kjaer Medical side-fire probe or the ATL HDI end-fire probe. The side-fire probes limited the prostate biopsy to a sagittal axis, whereas the end-fire probe allowed sampling in any section.
The overall prostate cancer detection rate (35.2%) was similar using all three probes. In a subgroup of patients with a PSA level of 4–10 ng/ml, however, the detection rate using the end-fire probe (31.3%) was statistically significantly higher than with either of the side-fire probes (P = 0.01). This was also the case in a further subgroup of patients with nonpalpable cancer.
In summary, the end-fire probe provided a higher prostate cancer detection rate in two patient subgroups, compared with the side-fire probes. The authors suggest that this was due to improved visualization of the lateral peripheral zone, in which most peripheral zone tumors occur.
Change history
17 May 2018
This article was published with the same DOI as a previous publication. A new DOI has been assigned and registered at Crossref, and has been corrected in the article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
End-fire ultrasound probes in prostate cancer diagnosis. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 1, 63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0035x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0035x