Abstract
This article comments on guidelines published by the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS in relation to exclusion of alternative diagnoses when multiple sclerosis (MS) is suspected. The guidelines cover recommendations from three working groups, each with a different remit: identification of 'red flags' for alternative diagnoses to MS; design of diagnostic algorithms for common clinically isolated syndromes; and differentiation of MS from other idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases. The major red flags identified in the study provide a useful list of diseases that need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of MS. The definition of clinically isolated syndromes is broadened, and the panel suggests that a stricter definition of encephalopathy should be set for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. The guidelines demonstrate the potential complexity of MS diagnosis—especially during the early stages of disease—and give useful guidance, especially for the non-MS neurologist, as to how to approach the diagnosis in a systematic way.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Schumacher GA et al. (1965) Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: report by the Panel on the Evaluation of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 122: 552–568
Poser CM et al. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13: 227–231
McDonald WI et al. (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50: 121–127
Polmann CH et al. (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis 2005: revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58: 840–846
Miller DH et al. (2008) Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult Scler 14: 1157–1174
Wingerchuk DM et al. (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66: 1485–1489
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palace, J. Guidelines for differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 134–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1047
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1047