Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Guidelines for differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis

Abstract

This article comments on guidelines published by the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS in relation to exclusion of alternative diagnoses when multiple sclerosis (MS) is suspected. The guidelines cover recommendations from three working groups, each with a different remit: identification of 'red flags' for alternative diagnoses to MS; design of diagnostic algorithms for common clinically isolated syndromes; and differentiation of MS from other idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases. The major red flags identified in the study provide a useful list of diseases that need to be considered in the differential diagnosis of MS. The definition of clinically isolated syndromes is broadened, and the panel suggests that a stricter definition of encephalopathy should be set for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. The guidelines demonstrate the potential complexity of MS diagnosis—especially during the early stages of disease—and give useful guidance, especially for the non-MS neurologist, as to how to approach the diagnosis in a systematic way.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Schumacher GA et al. (1965) Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: report by the Panel on the Evaluation of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 122: 552–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Poser CM et al. (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13: 227–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald WI et al. (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50: 121–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Polmann CH et al. (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis 2005: revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58: 840–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller DH et al. (2008) Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult Scler 14: 1157–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wingerchuk DM et al. (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66: 1485–1489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palace, J. Guidelines for differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 134–135 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1047

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing