Abstract
There has been much interest in pioneering neuroimaging experiments that study brain responses to sensory stimulation in patients in a minimally conscious or persistent vegetative state. Here, we discuss a recent study by Melanie Boly and her colleagues, in which brain responses to stimulation of the median nerve were measured by use of PET in healthy volunteers and in patients in either a minimally conscious or persistent vegetative state. The stimulation was considered to be painful by the volunteers but did not elicit behavioral responses in either of the two patient groups. Nevertheless, brain activation in patients in a minimally conscious (but not persistent vegetative) state was seen in areas very similar to those activated by the stimuli judged to be painful in healthy volunteers. Here, we discuss whether such data can be used to conclude that individuals with severe brain damage feel pain, and we consider the ethically appropriate clinical response to such important new data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Haynes JD and Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 523–534
Boly M et al. (2008) Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 7: 1013–1020
Giacino JT et al. (2002) The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58: 349–353
Rees G (2007) Neural correlates of the contents of visual awareness in humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362: 877–886
Rees G et al. (2002) Neural correlates of conscious and unconscious vision in parietal extinction. Neurocase 8: 387–393
Nachev P and Husain M (2007) Comment on “Detecting awareness in the vegetative state”. Science 315: 1221
Edwards SJL (2001) The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply. BMJ 323: 388–391
Sandin P (2004) Better Safe than Sorry: Applying Philosophical Methods to the Debate on Risk and the Precautionary Principle. Theses in Philosophy from the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm: KTH, Infrastructure
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rees, G., Edwards, S. Is pain in the brain?. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 76–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1001
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro1001
This article is cited by
-
The Perception of Pain and its Management in Disorders of Consciousness
Current Pain and Headache Reports (2013)