Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

How effective is intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis?

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been extensively used to treat humoral immunodeficiency states and various immune-mediated conditions. Several studies indicate that the benefits of IVIg with respect to relapses and MRI lesion activity compare favorably with those of interferon β and glatiramer acetate in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) or clinically isolated syndromes. Fazekas et al. recently reported the results of a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial of a new preparation of IVIg in 127 participants with RRMS. No significant benefit was demonstrated for IVIg compared with placebo for the primary end point (proportion of relapse-free participants), the main secondary end point (cumulative number of unique newly active brain MRI lesions), or a number of clinical and MRI tertiary end points. Neither the previous positive studies nor the negative results reported by Fazekas et al. can be considered to be definitive, and the utility of IVIg in RRMS remains uncertain at present.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Brannagan TH et al. (1996) Complications of intravenous immune globulin treatment in neurologic disease. Neurology 47: 674–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stangel M et al. (1999) Mechanisms of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins in demyelinating diseases. Arch Neurol 56: 661–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fazekas F et al. (1997) Randomized placebo-controlled trial of monthly intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 349: 589–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Achiron A et al. (1998) Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multiple sclerosis: effect on relapses. Neurology 50: 398–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorensen PS et al. (1998) Intravenous immunoglobulin G reduces MRI activity in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Neurology 50: 1273–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewanska M et al. (2002) No difference in efficacy of two different doses of intravenous immunoglobulins in MS: clinical and MRI assessment. Eur J Neurol 9: 565–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Achiron A et al. (2004) Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment following the first demyelinating event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Neurol 61: 1515–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazekas F et al. (2008) Intravenous immunoglobulin in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a dose-finding trial. Neurology 71: 265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

JA Cohen has acted as a consultant for and has received research support from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva, has acted as a consultant for Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, IMPAX, Incyte, Schering Plough and Wyeth, and has received research support from Artielle, BioMS, Immune Tolerance Network, Nancy Davis Center Without Walls, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and Orchestra Therapeutics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, J. How effective is intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis?. Nat Rev Neurol 4, 588–589 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0923

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0923

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing