Abstract
This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective study conducted by Devigili et al. that sought to establish gold standard diagnostic criteria for small fiber neuropathy (SFN). The chosen gold standard for SFN requires abnormalities on two out of three tests (clinical findings, skin biopsy [epidermal nerve fiber density] and quantitative sensory testing), with nerve conduction studies being normal. A total of 150 patients with sensory symptoms met study inclusion criteria, and 67 were determined to have SFN on the basis of the gold standard criteria. Epidermal nerve fiber density was the single most useful test for SFN with a diagnostic efficiency of 88.4%. This commentary argues in favor of a hierarchical system of levels of diagnostic certainty for SFN, depending on the number and type of abnormal diagnostic tests, in contrast to the dichotomous approach used by Devigili et al. We further highlight methodological limitations of the present study, such as the confounding of diagnostic-efficiency estimates for individual SFN tests through incorporation bias.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Gadolinium contrast agents: dermal deposits and potential effects on epidermal small nerve fibers
Journal of Neurology Open Access 04 May 2023
-
Normative data of contact heat evoked potentials from the lower extremities
Scientific Reports Open Access 20 July 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Devigili G et al. (2008) The diagnostic criteria for small fibre neuropathy: from symptoms to neuropathology. Brain 131: 1912–1925
Stewart JD et al. (1992) Distal small fiber neuropathy: results of tests of sweating and autonomic cardiovascular reflexes. Muscle Nerve 15: 661–665
Novak V et al. (2001) Autonomic impairment in painful neuropathy. Neurology 56: 861–868
Holland NR et al. (1998) Small fiber sensory neuropathies: clinical course and neuropathology of idiopathic cases. Ann Neurol 44: 47–59
Herrmann DN et al. (2004) Plantar nerve AP and skin biopsy in sensory neuropathies with normal routine conduction studies. Neurology 63: 879–885
Smith AG et al. (2008) Idiopathic neuropathy patients are at high risk for metabolic syndrome. J Neurol Sci 273: 25–28
England JD et al. (2005) Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a definition for clinical research: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 64: 199–207
Lauria G et al. (2003) Axonal swellings predict the degeneration of epidermal nerve fibers in painful neuropathies. Neurology 61: 631–636
Benatar M (2006) Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: limitations of the proposed case definition. Muscle Nerve 34: 131–134
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Botez, S., Herrmann, D. Pitfalls of diagnostic criteria for small fiber neuropathy. Nat Rev Neurol 4, 586–587 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0920
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0920
This article is cited by
-
Gadolinium contrast agents: dermal deposits and potential effects on epidermal small nerve fibers
Journal of Neurology (2023)
-
Normative data of contact heat evoked potentials from the lower extremities
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Utility of Skin Biopsy to Evaluate Peripheral Neuropathy
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (2010)