Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

The Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale: ready for use in clinical practice?

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses a report by Torres-Mozqueda et al. on a newly developed classification instrument for predicting outcome after stroke, the Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale (BASIS). This tool incorporates imaging data on the patency of the vasculature and the parenchyma and classifies ischemic strokes as major (if large vessels are occluded or parenchymal changes are present) or minor (all others). When testing the scale, the authors looked at short-term outcome at the time of hospital discharge; patients classified with major stroke by BASIS had a higher mortality and longer hospital stay and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility than patients with minor stroke. The authors concluded that BASIS can predict outcome after stroke. We point to several shortcomings in the study methodology and argue that, although BASIS has potential as a prognostic tool, further studies are needed before it can be widely used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Sacco RL et al. (2007) Experimental treatments for acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 369: 331–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hjort N et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct. Stroke 36: 388–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schellinger PD et al. (2001) Stroke magnetic resonance imaging within 6 hours after onset of hyperacute cerebral ischemia. Ann Neurol 49: 460–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Torres-Mozqueda F et al. (2008) An acute ischemic stroke classification instrument that includes CT or MR angiography: the Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 1111–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan PW et al. (2000) Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 31: 1429–1438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. König IR et al. (2008) Predicting long-term outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a simple index works in patients from controlled clinical trials. Stroke 39: 1821–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Köhrmann M and Schellinger PD (2007) Stroke-MRI: extending the time-window: recent trials and clinical practice. Int J Stroke 2: 53–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José G Merino.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merino, J., Latour, L. The Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale: ready for use in clinical practice?. Nat Rev Neurol 4, 592–593 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0919

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0919

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing