Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Does increased removal of high-molecular-weight toxins improve the survival of hemodialysis patients?

Abstract

This commentary discusses a small multicenter, prospective clinical trial in which patients with end-stage renal disease were randomized to treatment with online high-flux hemofiltration or low-flux hemodialysis. Over a 3-year follow-up period, survival was significantly better in patients who received online hemofiltration than in patients who received low-flux hemodialysis. In addition, the average duration, but not the frequency, of hospitalization, and the incidence of intradialytic hypotension, were lower in the hemofiltration group than in the hemodialysis group. The study supports the hypothesis that increased removal of large molecules can decrease the high morbidity and mortality associated with end-stage renal disease. However, the applicability of the findings to the general population of patients with end-stage renal disease might be limited by the small size of the study, the demographics of the study population, and the high dropout rate. Larger trials are needed to confirm this study's results and to establish the appropriate dose of convection for optimal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Eknoyan G et al. (2002) Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 347: 2010–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Santoro A et al. (2008) The effect of on-line high-flux hemofiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis on mortality in chronic kidney failure: a small randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 52: 507–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Kuijk WH et al. (1997) Critical role of the extracorporeal blood temperature in the hemodynamic response during hemofiltration. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 949–955

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanholder R et al. (2008) Uraemic toxins and cardiovascular disease: in vitro research versus clinical outcome studies. NDT Plus 1: 2–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Canaud B et al. (2006) Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS. Kidney Int 69: 2087–2093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marshall MR et al. (2006) Associations of hemodialysis dose and session length with mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand patients. Kidney Int 69: 1229–1236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has declared associations with the following companies: Fresenius, as a consultant, Gambro, as a consultant and recipient of grant/research support, and Rockwell Medical Technologies, as recipient of grant/research support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, R. Does increased removal of high-molecular-weight toxins improve the survival of hemodialysis patients?. Nat Rev Nephrol 5, 14–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph1002

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph1002

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing