Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

How useful is capsule endoscopy for the selection of patients for double-balloon enteroscopy?

Abstract

Although double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is useful for the diagnosis and management of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, the technique is fairly invasive, has several limitations, and can be associated with complications. It is, therefore, important to identify those patients who will benefit most from DBE, and those in whom the procedure should be avoided. In this Practice Point commentary, we discuss the findings and limitations of a retrospective study conducted by Hendel and colleagues that evaluated the utility of capsule endoscopy screening for the selection of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding who would benefit from DBE. The results suggest that capsule endoscopy screening is useful to predict the diagnostic yield of DBE, guide the route of DBE, influence sedation choices, and avoid the performance of unnecessary procedures. This commentary highlights the issues to consider when interpreting and generalizing these results in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Matsumoto T et al. (2005) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy with the double-balloon method in patients with obscure bleeding and polyposis. Endoscopy 37: 827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasha SF et al. (2008) Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 671–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hendel JW et al. (2008) Double-balloon endoscopy: who needs it? Scan J Gastroenterol 43: 363–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis BS et al. (2005) A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials. Endoscopy 37: 960–965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaffes AJ et al. (2007) Clinical outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with obscure GI bleeding and a positive capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 66: 304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Concha R et al. (2007) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 41: 242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jones BH et al. (2005). Yield of repeat wireless video capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 1058–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A Leighton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

SF Pasha declared no competing interests.

JA Leighton has received grant/research support from Given Imaging, Fujinon and Olympus. He is also a Consultant for Given Imaging.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasha, S., Leighton, J. How useful is capsule endoscopy for the selection of patients for double-balloon enteroscopy?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 5, 490–491 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1201

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing