A well-diversified biotechnology portfolio, strong financial community, and excellence in technology transfer position Minnesota for continued expansion.
Article PDF
References
Blumenthal, D., et al. 1996. Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences. N. Engl. J. Med. 334: 368–373.
Blumenthal, D., et al. 1986. University Industry research relationships in biotechnology: Implications for the university. Science 232: 1361–1366.
Stevens, A.J. 1993.Testimony to US Department of Commerce Hearing on the Bayh-Dole Act, Washington, DC, October 1993.
Massing, D.E. 1996. A Five Year Summary of Technology Licensing Performance for US and Canadian Academic and Nonprofit Institutions, and Patent Management Firms. Association of University Technology Managers Inc., Norwalk, CT.
Haber, E. 1996. Industry and the university. Nature Biotechnology 14: 441–442.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, T., Lauber, A. Minnesota's biotechnology portfolio. Nat Biotechnol 15, 737–740 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0897-737
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0897-737