Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Patents
  • Published:

Patenting bioinformatic inventions: Emerging trends in the United States

With bioinformatics-related patents on the rise and case law growing, a timely review can improve your chances for successful patenting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Welch, T.J. Bioinformatics tools for managing the volumes of data generated by the life sciences today may be even more valuable than many gene discoveries. http://www.mbf-law.com/pubs/articles/600.cfm.

  2. Chow, M. & Fernandez, D. Intellectual property strategies for the bioinformatics future. http://www.tnty.com/newsletter/futures/business2.html.

  3. Gatto, J.G. Bioinformatics patents—challenges and opportunities. http://www.mintz.com/publications/detail/152/Intellectual_Property_Advisory_Bioinformatics_Patents_Challenges_and_Opportunities/.

  4. US Patent and Trademark Office. Examination guidelines for computer-related inventions. 61 Fed. Reg. 7478 (1996).

  5. In re Prater, 415 F.2d 1378 (CCPA 1968).

  6. Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 US 63 (1972).

  7. Parker v. Flook, 437 US 584 (1978).

  8. Diamond v. Diehr, 450 US 175 (1981).

  9. In re Freeman, 573 F.2d 1237 (CCPA 1978).

  10. In re Walter, 618 F.2d 758 (CCPA 1980).

  11. In re Abele, 684 F.2d 902 (CCPA 1982).

  12. In re Alappat, 33 F.3d 1526 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

  13. State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Fin. Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998).

  14. In re Beauregard, 53 F.3d 1583 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

  15. 31 USPQ 2d 1754 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

  16. 32 USPQ 2d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

  17. System and method for conformationally-flexible molecular recognition. US patent 5,787,279 (1998).

  18. US patent 6,089,742 (2000).

  19. US patent 5,664,177 (1997).

  20. In re Alappat, 33 F.3d. 1526, at 1545 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

  21. Under 35 USC §101.

  22. Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image. US patent 6,385,350 (2002).

  23. Method and apparatus for generating a database which is used for determining the design quality of network nodes. US patent 6,279,143 (2002).

  24. 35 USC §282.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hultquist, S., Harrison, R. & Yang, Y. Patenting bioinformatic inventions: Emerging trends in the United States. Nat Biotechnol 20, 743–744 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0702-743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0702-743

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing