Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Progress
  • Published:

Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices

Nature volume 418, pages 685–688 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

One key challenge for the twenty-first century is how to produce the food we need, yet ensure the landscape we want. Genetically modified crops have focused our attention on how to answer this question for one part of agriculture. The same principles could be applied to assess environmental impacts of future land-use change in a much broader context.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Land use by agriculture and other uses.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conway, G. & Toenniessen, G. Feeding the world in the twenty-first century. Nature 402, C55–C58 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krebs, J. R., Wilson, J. D., Bradbury, R. B. & Sirwardena, G. M. The second Silent Spring? Nature 400, 611–612 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Crawley, M. J., Hails, R. S., Rees, M., Kohn, D. & Buxton, J. The ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363, 620–623 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Trewavas, A. J. & Leaver, C. J. Is opposition to GM crops science or politics? EMBO Rep. 2, 1–5 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50, 53 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crawley, M. J., Brown, S. L., Hails, R. S., Kohn, D. & Rees, M. The performance of transgenic crops in natural habitats: a 10-year perspective. Nature 409, 682–683 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, J. I. in Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops: Risk, Benefit and Trade Considerations (eds McLean, G. D. et al.) 115–124 (Bureau of Resource Sciences, Kingston, ACT, 1997).

  9. Crawley, M. J. Bollworms, genes and ecologists. Nature 400, 501–502 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hails, R. S. Genetically modified organisms—the debate continues. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 14–18 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shea, K. & Chesson, P. What can community theory tell us about biological invasions? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 170–176 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE) Sub-group on Wider Biodiversity Issues. Guidance on the Assessment of the Impact on Wider Biodiversity from Proposed Cultivation of GM Crops 〈http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/biodiversity/guidance/index.htm〉 (31 July 2001).

  13. Firbank, L. G. et al. Farm-scale evaluation of GM crops explained. Nature 399, 727–728 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission. Crops on Trial (DTI, London, 2001)

  15. Watkinson, A. R., Freckleton, R. P., Robinson, R. A. & Sutherland, W. J. Predicting biodiversity responses to GM herbicide tolerant crops. Science 289, 1554–1556 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Firbank, L. G. & Forcella, F. Genetically modified crops and farmland biodiversity. Science 289, 1481–1482 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Daily, G. C. et al. The value of Nature and the nature of value. Science 289, 395–396 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tilman, D. et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292, 281–284 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sutherland, W. J. Restoring a sustainable countryside. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 148–150 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beringer, J. E. Farming for biodiversity with GMOs? Outlook Agric. 30, 7–9 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Phipps, R. H. & Park, J. R. Environmental benefits of genetically modified crops: global and European perspectives on their ability to reduce pesticide use. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 11, 1–18 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pretty, J. N. et al. An assessment of the total external costs of UK agriculture. Agric. Syst. 65, 113–136 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pidgeon, J. D., Dewar, A. M. & May, M. J. in Proc. BCPC-Weeds 2001, 373–380 (BCPC Publications, Bracknell, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh, J. Integrated Farm Management—A Farm Strategy for the 21st Century (LEAF, The National Agricultural Centre, Stoneleigh, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tilman, D. The greening of the green revolution. Nature 396, 211–212 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson, P. J. in Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation (ed. Boatman, N.) BCPC Monogr. No. 58, 253–258 (BCPC Publications, Bracknell, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bakker, J. P. & Berendse, F. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 63–68 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bobbink, R., Hornung, M. & Roelofs, J. G. M. in Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Mapping Critical Loads/Levels (UN ECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution), 71–96, III-i-III-54 (Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Perfecto, I., Rice, R. A., Greenberg, R. & Van der Voort, M. E. Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46, 598–608 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chamberlain, D. E., Fuller, R. J., Bunce, J. C., Duckworth, J. C. & Shrubb, M. Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 771–788 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chamberlain, D. E. & Fuller, R. J. Local extinctions and changes in species richness of lowland farmland birds in England and Wales in relation to recent changes in agricultural land-use. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 78, 1–17 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gates, S. & Donald, P. F. Local extinction of British farmland birds and the prediction of further loss. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 806–820 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Donald, P. F., Green, R. E. & Heath, M. F. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 25–29 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell, L. H. et al. A Review of the Indirect Effect of Pesticides on Birds JNCC Report No. 227 (Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilson, J. D., Morris, A. J., Arroyo, B. E., Clark, S. C. & Bradbury, R. B. A review of the abundance and diversity of invertebrate and plant foods of granivorous birds in northern Europe in relation to agricultural change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 75, 13–30 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haines-Young, R. H. et al. Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smart, S. M., Firbank, L. G., Bunce, R. G. H. & Watkins, J. W. Quantifying changes in abundance of food plants for butterfly larvae and farmland birds. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 398–414 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Firbank, L. & Smart, S. in Aspects of Applied Biology, Birds and Agriculture (eds Boatman, N. D. et al.) 165–170 (Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hald, A. B. The impact of changing the season in which cereals are sown on the diversity of the weed flora in rotational fields in Denmark. J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 24–32 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Siriwardena, G. M., Baille, S. R. & Wilson, J. D. Variation in the survival rates of some British passerines with respect to their population trends on farmland. Bird Study 45, 276–292 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Siriwardena, G. M., Baille, S. R. & Wilson, J. D. Temporal variation in the annual survival rates of six granivorous birds with contrasting population trends. Ibis 141, 621–636 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Peach, W. J., Lovett, L. J., Wotton, S. R. & Jeffs, C. Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biol. Conserv. 101, 361–373 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chamberlain, D. E., Wilson, A. M., Browne, S. J. & Vickery, J. A. Effects of habitat type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding season. J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 856–870 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson, R. A. & Sutherland, W. J. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 157–176 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Falconer, K. & Ward, N. Using modulation to green the CAP: the UK case. Land Use Policy 17, 269–277 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Policy Commission on the Future of Farming and Food. Farming and Food—A Sustainable Future 〈http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/farming/index/CommissionReport.htm〉 (January 2002).

  47. Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R. & Gilissen, N. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413, 723–725 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Whitfield, J. Birds fly in the face of 'green' farming incentive scheme. Nature 413, 659 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lawton, J. H. Community Ecology in a Changing World Excellence in Ecology no. 11 (International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Digest of Environmental Statistics 〈http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics/des/index.htm〉 (November 2001).

  51. Vesterby, M. & Krupa, K. S. Major Uses of Land in the US, 1997 ERS Statistical Bulletin No. 973 〈http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb973/〉 (September 2001).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to J. Perry, A. Gray, A. Lilley, P. Dale and L. Firbank for helpful comments and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK

    R. S. Hails

Authors
  1. R. S. Hails
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Hails.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hails, R. Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Nature 418, 685–688 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01016

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing