Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technique
  • Published:

Refined induction of anesthesia with remifentanil after bolus propofol administration in Landrace/Large White swine

Abstract

The authors report a prospective randomized blind study in which they used a refined anesthetic technique in male Landrace/Large White swine (n = 125 pigs, 19 ± 2 kg, 10–15 weeks old). The animals were first premedicated with ketamine, midazolam and atropine and then given a dose of 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 μg remifentanil per kg body weight (dose amounts were randomly assigned) after a bolus dose of propofol. The authors assessed the intubation conditions (e.g., jaw relaxation and other parameters) 20 min after premedication and then 5 min after anesthesia induction. All animals that received each of the different remifentanil dose amounts were successfully intubated in less than 30 s. No animal developed apnea during intubation or experienced substantial reductions in heart rate or blood pressure (> 25%) between the two time points (20 min after premedication and 5 min after anesthesia induction). Overall intubation conditions were significantly better in animals that received 5 μg remifentanil per kg body weight than in animals that received other dose amounts (P < 0.001). The average time to intubation was significantly shorter for animals that received 5 μg remifentanil per kg body weight than for animals that received any of the other dose amounts (P < 0.001). The authors concluded that for this study, 5 μg remifentanil per kg body weight resulted in excellent intubating conditions in this swine breed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ratings of overall intubating conditions (jaw relaxation, resistance to laryngoscope, vocal cord position, vocal cord movement and response to intubation) in the different study groups.
Figure 2: Ratings of individual intubation parameters in the different study groups.
Figure 3

References

  1. Greene, S.A. & Benson, G.J. Porcine anesthesia. in Veterinary Anesthesia and Pain Management Secrets (ed. Greene, S.A.) 273–274 (Hanley and Belfus Inc., Philadelphia, 2002).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, R., Olufolabi, A.J., Booth, J., El-Moalem, H.E. & Glass, P.S. Dosing study of remifentanil and propofol for tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants. Anaesthesia 54, 1037–1040 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grant, S., Noble, S., Woods, A., Murdoch, J. & Davidson, A. Assessment of intubating conditions in adults after induction with propofol and varying doses of remifentanil. Br. J. Anaesth. 81, 540–543 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bouvet, L. et al. Optimal remifentanil dosage for providing excellent intubating conditions when co-administered with a single standard dose of propofol. Anaesthesia 64, 719–726 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bayne, K. Developing guidelines on the care and use of animals. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 862, 105–110 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xanthos, T. et al. Cardiopulmonary arrest and resuscitation in Landrace/Large White swine: a research model. Lab. Anim. 41, 353–362 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Viby-Mogensen, J. et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 40, 59–74 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Woods, A.W. & Allam, S. Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Br. J. Anaesth. 94, 150–158 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Michelsen, L.G. & Hug, C.C. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil. J. Clin. Anesth. 8, 679–682 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beers, R. & Camporesi, E. Remifentanil update: clinical science and utility. CNS Drugs 18, 1085–1104 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mastronardi, P., Cafiero, T. & De Cillis, P. Remifentanil in anesthesia and intensive care. [Italian] Minerva Anestesiol. 66, 417–423 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kweon, T.D. et al. The effect of bolus administration of remifentanil on QTc interval during induction of sevoflurane anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 63, 347–351 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barclay, K. & Kluger, M.T. Effect of bolus dose of remifentanil on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anaesth. Intensive Care 28, 403–407 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Albertin, A., Casati, A., Bergonzi, P., Fano, G. & Torri, G. Effects of two target-controlled concentrations (1 and 3 ng/ml) of remifentanil on MAC(BAR) of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology 100, 255–259 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Joo, H.S. et al. Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation in patients with cardiac disease. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 18, 263–268 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, G.H. & Sun, L. Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction. Chin. Med. J. (Engl) 122, 2330–2334 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barker, P., Langton, J.A., Wilson, I.G. & Smith, G. Movement of the vocal cords on induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol. Br. J. Anaesth. 69, 23–25 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Webster, V.L., Cara, D.M., Walker, R.M., Ramsay, M.M. & Aitkenhead, A.R. Description of a technique for anaesthetizing pregnant ewes for fetal surgery. Lab. Anim. 39, 94–99 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Batra, Y.K. et al. Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant. Paediatr. Anaesth. 14, 452–456 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Klemola, U.M. & Hiller, A. Tracheal intubation after induction of anesthesia in children with propofol-remifentanil or propofol-rocuronium. Can. J. Anaesth. 47, 854–859 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xanthos, T. et al. Baseline hemodynamics in anesthetized Landrace–Large White Swine: reference values for research in cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation models. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46, 21–25 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros T. Xanthos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demestiha, T., Pantazopoulos, I., Dontas, I. et al. Refined induction of anesthesia with remifentanil after bolus propofol administration in Landrace/Large White swine. Lab Anim 39, 319–324 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1010-319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1010-319

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing