Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in disposable and reusable static mouse cages

Lab Animal volume 38, pages 16–23 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

The value of a static mouse cage is partially determined by the cage's ability to dissipate carbon dioxide and ammonia. The authors compared the concentrations of ammonia and carbon dioxide produced by mice housed in two types of static isolator cages: a newly introduced disposable cage and a conventional reusable cage. Female mice were housed in three disposable and three reusable cages (n = 5 per cage). After 7 d, groups that were housed in disposable cages were rehoused in fresh reusable cages and vice versa. Intracage carbon dioxide, ammonia, temperature and relative humidity were measured daily. Overall, there were no significant differences in carbon dioxide or ammonia concentrations between the cage types. Within 30 min of placing mice in cages, carbon dioxide concentrations rose to more than 10,000 ppm in both cage types and rarely dropped below 8,000 ppm during both phases of the study. Ammonia concentrations rose slowly until day 4 and then began to rise rapidly. The maximum average ammonia concentration was 710 ppm. There was a highly significant relationship between increasing levels of humidity and ammonia production in the disposable cages (r = 0.88). For the reusable cages, the correlation was not as strong (r = 0.68). Both cage types were similar in their ability to dissipate carbon dioxide and ammonia. The suggested frequency of cage changing can only be estimated; on the basis of existing literature, it seems prudent to change cages when the ammonia concentration reaches 50 ppm.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Static mouse cages.
Figure 2: Average intracage carbon dioxide concentrations detected in the front and rear sampling ports of disposable (n = 3) and reusable (n = 3) cages.
Figure 3: Average intracage humidity levels and ammonia concentrations detected in the front and rear sampling ports of disposable (n = 3) and reusable (n = 3) cages.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi, G.C., McQuinn, J.S., Jennings, B.L., Hassett, D.J. & Michaels, S.E. Effect of population size on humidity and ammonia levels in individually ventilated microisolation rodent caging. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 33, 77–81 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipman, N. Isolator rodent caging systems (State of the art): A critical view. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 38, 9–17 (1999).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perkins, S.E. & Lipman, N.S. Evaluation of microenvironmental conditions and noise generation in three individually ventilated rodent caging systems and static isolator cages. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 35, 61–65 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burn, C.C., Peters, A., Day, M.J. & Mason, G.J. Long-term effects of cage-cleaning frequency and bedding type on laboratory rat health, welfare, and handleability: a cross-laboratory study. Lab. Anim. 40, 353–370 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Serrano, L.J. Carbon dioxide and ammonia in mouse cages: effects of cage covers, population, and activity. Lab. Anim. Sci. 21, 75–85 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Winkle, T.J. & Balk, M.W. Spontaneous corneal opacities in laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36, 248–255 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kacergis, J.G. et al. Air quality in an animal facility: particulates, ammonia, and volatile organic compounds. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57, 634–640 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tepper, J., Weiss, B. & Wood, R.W. Alterations in behavior produced by inhaled ozone or ammonia. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 5, 1110–1118 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burn, C.C. & Mason, G.J. Absorbencies of six different rodent beddings: commercially advertised absorbencies are potentially misleading. Lab. Anim. 39, 68–74 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perkins, S.E. & Lipman, N.S. Characterization and qualification of microenvironmental contaminants in isolator cages with a variety of contact beddings. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 34, 93–98 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McLean, R.A., Sanders, W.L. & Stroup, W.W. A unified approach to mixed linear models. Am. Stat. 45, 54–64 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Corbeil, R.R. & Searle, S.R. Restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of variance components in the mixed model. Technometrics 18, 31–38 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12 1st edn. 571–702 (SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, 1997).

  14. Hsu, J.C. The factor analytic approach to simultaneous inference in the general linear model. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1, 151–168 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel, W.W. Applied Nonparametric Statistics 2nd edn. (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keller, L.S.F., White, W.J., Snider, M.T. & Lang, C.M. An evaluation of intra-cage ventilation in three animal caging systems. Lab. Anim. Sci. 39, 237–242 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Corning, B.F. & Lipman, N.S. A comparison of rodent caging systems based on microenvironmental parameters. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41, 498–503 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Krohn, T.C. & Hansen, A.K. Carbon dioxide concentrations in unventilated IVC cages. Lab. Anim. 36, 209–211 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Höglund, A.U. & Renström, A. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: cage environment and animal health aspects. Lab. Anim. 35, 51–57 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krohn, T.C., Hansen, A.K. & Dragsted, N. The impact of low levels of carbon dioxide on rats. Lab. Anim. 37, 94–99 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nielsen, G.D., Petersen, S.H., Vinggaard, A.M., Hansen, L.F. & Wolkoff, P. Ventilation, carbon dioxide production, and carbon dioxide exposure effects in conscious, restrained CF-1 mice. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 72, 163–168 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krohn, T.C. & Hansen, A.K. The effects and tolerances for carbon dioxide in relation to recent developments in laboratory animal housing. Scand. J. Lab. Anim. Sci. 27, 173–181 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, J. et al. Detection of near-atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide by an olfactory subsystem in the mouse. Science 317, 953–957 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, Toxic and Hazardous Substances, Air contaminants. 29 CFR 1910.1000.

  25. Greiner, T. Indoor air quality: Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering @ Iowa State University (1995)[online] <http://www3.abe.iastate.edu/human_house/aen125.asp>.

  26. Memarzadeh, F. Ventilation Design Handbook on Animal Research Facilities Using Static Microisolators, vol. 1 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 1998) [online] <http://orf.od.nih.gov/PoliciesAndGuidelines/Bioenvironmental/cover.htm>.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Reeb, C.K., Jones, R.B., Bearg, D.W., Bedigian, H. & Paigen, B. Impact of room ventilation rates on mouse cage ventilation and microenvironment. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36, 74–79 (1997).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Broderson, J., Lindsey, J. & Crawford, J. The role of environmental ammonia in respiratory mycoplasmosis of rats. Am. J. Pathol. 85, 115–130 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gamble, M.R. & Clough, G. Ammonia build-up in animal boxes and its effect on rat tracheal epithelium. Lab. Anim. 10, 93–104 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith, A.L., Mabus, S.L., Stockwell, J.D. & Muir, C.M. Effects of housing density and cage floor space on C57BL/6J mice. Comp. Med. 54, 656–663 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reeb-Whitaker, C.K. et al. The impact of reduced frequency of cage changes on the health of mice housed in ventilated cages. Lab. Anim. 35, 58–73 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, 01655, MA

    Jerald Silverman &  David W. Bays

  2. Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, 01655, MA

    Jerald Silverman

  3. Departments of Information Services and Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, 01655, MA

    Stephen P. Baker

Authors
  1. Jerald Silverman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Bays
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen P. Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerald Silverman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, J., Bays, D. & Baker, S. Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in disposable and reusable static mouse cages. Lab Anim 38, 16–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0109-16

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0109-16

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing