Abstract
Aggression is a major welfare issue in mice, particularly when mice unfamiliar to each other are first placed in cages, as happens on receipt from a vendor, and following cage cleaning. Injuries from aggression are the second leading cause of unplanned euthanasia in mice, following ulcerative dermatitis. Commonly employed strategies for reducing aggression-related injury are largely anecdotal, and may even be counterproductive. Here we report a series of experiments testing potential explanations and interventions for post-shipping aggression-related injuries in C57BL/6 mice. First, we examined the effects of weaning: testing whether manipulating weaning age reduced aggression-related injuries, and if repeated mixing of weaned mice before shipping increased these injuries. Contrary to our predictions, repeated mixing did not increase post-shipping injurious aggression, and early weaning reduced aggression-related injuries. Second, we examined potential post-shipping interventions: testing whether lavender essential oil applied to the cage reduced aggression-related injuries, and whether a variety of enrichments decreased injurious aggression. Again, contrary to predictions, lavender increased wounding, and none of the enrichments reduced it. However, consistent with the effects of weaning age in the first experiment, cages with higher mean body weight showed elevated levels of aggression-related wounding. Finally, we tested whether C57BL/6 substrains and identification methods affected levels of intra-cage wounding from aggression. We found no effect of strain, but cages where mice were ear-notched for identification showed higher levels of wounding than cages where mice were tail-tattooed. Overall, these results emphasize the multifactorial nature of home-cage injurious aggression, and the importance of testing received wisdom when it comes to managing complex behavioral and welfare problems. In terms of practical recommendations to reduce aggressive wounding in the home cage, tail tattooing is recommended over ear notching and late weaning should be avoided.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crowcroft, P. Mice All Over (The Chicago Zoological Society, 1966).
Macdonald, D.W. The ecology of carnivore social behavior. Nature 301, 379–384 (1983).
Gray, S.J., Jensen, S.P. & Hurst, J.L. Effects of resource distribution on activity and territory defence in house mice, Mus domesticus. Anim. Behav. 63, 531–539 (2002).
Latham, N. & Mason, G. From house mouse to mouse house: the behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications in the laboratory. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86, 261–289 (2004).
Howerton, C.L., Garner, J.P. & Mench, J.A. Effects of a running wheel-igloo enrichment on aggression, hierarchy linearity, and stereotypy in group-housed male CD-1 (ICR) mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 115, 90–103 (2008).
Grant, E.C. & Mackintosh, J.H. A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour 21, 246–259 (1963).
Vanabeelen, J.H.F. Mouse mutants studied by means of ethological methods. 1. Ethogram. Genetica 34, 79 (1963).
Gonder, J.C. & Laber, K. A renewed look at laboratory rodent housing and management. ILAR J. 48, 29–36 (2007).
Bartolomucci, A. et al. Individual housing induces altered immuno-endocrine responses to psychological stress in male mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28, 540–558 (2003).
Arndt, S.S. et al. Individual housing of mice–impact on behaviour and stress responses. Physiol. Behav. 97, 385–393 (2009).
Hunt, C. & Hambly, C. Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group housed males. Physiol. Behav. 87, 519–526 (2006).
Pham, T.M. et al. Housing environment influences the need for pain relief during post-operative recovery in mice. Physiol. Behav. 99, 663–668 (2010).
Späni, D., Arras, M., König, B. & Rülicke, T. Higher heart rate of laboratory mice housed individually vs in pairs. Lab. Anim. 37, 54–62 (2003).
Keeney, A.J. & Hogg, S. Behavioural consequences of repeated social defeat in the mouse: preliminary evaluation of a potential animal model of depression. Behav. Pharmacol. 10, 753–764 (1999).
Miczek, K.A., Maxson, S.C., Fish, E.W. & Faccidomo, S. Aggressive behavioral phenotypes in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 167–181 (2001).
Barnard, C.J., Behnke, J.M. & Sewell, J. Environmental enrichment, immunocompetence, and resistance to Babesia microti in male mice. Physiol. Behav. 60, 1223–1231 (1996).
Curley, J.P. et al. The meaning of weaning: influence of the weaning period on behavioral development in mice. Dev. Neurosci. 31, 318–331 (2009).
Beck, J.A. et al. Genealogies of mouse inbred strains. Nat. Genet. 24, 23–25 (2000).
Canastar, A. & Maxson, S.C. Sexual aggression in mice: effects of male strain and of female estrous state. Behav. Genet. 33, 521–528 (2003).
Zurita, E. et al. Genetic polymorphisms among C57BL/6 mouse inbred strains. Transgenic Res. 20, 481–489 (2011).
Bryant, C.D. et al. Behavioral differences among C57BL/6 substrains: implications for transgenic and knockout studies. J. Neurogenet. 22, 315–331 (2008).
Matsuo, N. et al. Behavioral profiles of three C57BL/6 substrains. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 29 (2010).
Gaskill, B.N. et al. Energy reallocation to breeding performance through improved nest building in laboratory mice. PLoS ONE 8, e74153 (2013).
Gaskill, B.N., Winnicker, C., Garner, J.P. & Pritchett-Corning, K.R. The naked truth: Breeding performance in nude mice with and without nesting material. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 143, 110–116 (2013).
Gaskill, B.N. et al. Impact of nesting material on mouse body temperature and physiology. Physiol. Behav. 110–111, 87–95 (2013).
Van Loo, P.L. et al. Influence of cage enrichment on aggressive behaviour and physiological parameters in male mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 76, 65–81 (2002).
Bazille, P.G., Walden, S.D., Koniar, B.L. & Gunther, R. Commercial cotton nesting material as a predisposing factor for conjunctivitis in athymic nude mice. Lab Anim. (NY) 30, 40–42 (2001).
Swetter, B.J., Karpiak, C.P. & Cannon, J.T. Separating the effects of shelter from additional cage enhancements for group-housed BALB/cJ mice. Neurosci. Lett. 495, 205–209 (2011).
Tischkau, S.A. & Mukai, M. Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by cotton balls used for environmental enrichment. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 357–362 (2009).
Van de Weerd, H.A. et al. Effects of environmental enrichment for mice: variation in experimental results. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 5, 87–109 (2002).
Van de Weerd, H.A., Baumans, V., Koolhaas, J.M. & van Zutphen, L.F. Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. J. Exp. Anim. Sci. 36, 117–127 (1994).
Walker, M.D. & Mason, G. Female C57BL/6 mice show consistent individual differences in spontaneous interaction with environmental enrichment that are predicted by neophobia. Behav. Brain Res. 224, 207–212 (2011).
Nicol, C.J., Brocklebank, S., Mendl, M. & Sherwin, C.M. A targeted approach to developing environmental enrichment for two strains of laboratory mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 110, 341–353 (2008).
Frank, D., Beauchamp, G. & Palestrini, C. Systematic review of the use of pheromones for treatment of undesirable behavior in cats and dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 236, 1308–1316 (2010).
de Almeida, R.N., Motta, S.C., de Brito Faturi, C., Catallani, B. & Leite, J.R. Anxiolytic-like effects of rose oil inhalation on the elevated plus-maze test in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 77, 361–364 (2004).
de Sousa, D.P. Anxiolytic essential oils. Natural Products Chemistry & Research 1 (2012).
Linck, V.M. et al. Effects of inhaled Linalool in anxiety, social interaction and aggressive behavior in mice. Phytomedicine 17, 679–683 (2010).
Gaskill, B.N. et al. He's getting under my skin! Comparing the sensitivity and specificity of dermal vs subcuticular lesions as a measure of aggression in mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 183, 77–85 (2016).
Grafen, A. & Hails, R. Modern statistics for the life sciences (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Nevison, C.M., Hurst, J.L. & Barnard, C.J. Strain-specific effects of cage enrichment in male laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Anim. Welf. 8, 361–379 (1999).
Eskola, S. & Kaliste-Korhonen, E. Aspen wood-wool is preferred as a resting place, but does not affect intracage fighting of male BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice. Lab. Anim. 33, 108–121 (1999).
Lockworth, C.R., Kim, S.J., Liu, J., Palla, S.L. & Craig, S.L. Effect of enrichment devices on aggression in manipulated nude mice. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 54, 731–736 (2015).
König, B. & Markl, H. Maternal-care in house mice 1. The weaning strategy as a means for parental manipulation of offspring quality. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20, 1–9 doi:10.1007/Bf00292161 (1987).
Kikusui, T., Takeuchi, Y. & Mori, Y. Early weaning induces anxiety and aggression in adult mice. Physiol. Behav. 81, 37–42 (2004).
Würbel, H. & Stauffacher, M. Age and weight at weaning affect corticosterone level and development of stereotypies in ICR mice. Anim. Behav. 53, 891–900 (1997).
Monteiro, L.S. & Falconer, D.S. Compensatory growth and sexual maturity in mice. Anim. Prod. 8, 179–192 (1966).
Mill, D.S. et al. (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Animal Behavior and Welfare (CABI, Wallingford, 2010).
Defries, J.C. & Mcclearn, G.E. Social dominance and darwinian fitness in a laboratory mouse. American Naturalist 104 (1970).
Van Zegeren, K. Variation in aggressiveness and the regulation of numbers in house mouse populations. Neth. J. Zool. 30, 635–770 (1980).
Bartolomucci, A. et al. Age at group formation alters behavior and physiology in male but not female CD-1 mice. Physiol. Behav. 82, 425–434 (2004).
Van Loo, P.L., Kruitwagen, C.L.J.J., Van Zutphen, B.F., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of cage cleaning regime and scent marks. Anim. Welf. 9, 281–295 (2000).
Hurst, J.L. The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty: urine marking and investigation within family groups. Animal Behaviour 37, 705–725 (1989).
Umezu, T. et al. Anticonflict effects of lavender oil and identification of its active constituents. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 85, 713–721 (2006).
Shaw, D., Annett, J.M., Doherty, B. & Leslie, J.C. Anxiolytic effects of lavender oil inhalation on open-field behaviour in rats. Phytomedicine 14, 613–620 (2007).
Cline, M., Taylor, J.E., Flores, J., Bracken, S. & Ceremuga, T.E. Investigation of the anxiolytic effects of linalool, a lavender extract, in the male Sprague-Dawley rat. AANA J. 76, 1–6 (2008).
Linck, V.M. et al. Effects of inhaled linalool in anxiety, social interaction and aggressive behavior in mice. Phytomedicine 17, 679–683 (2010).
Souto-Maior, F.N. et al. Anxiolytic-like effects of inhaled linalool oxide in experimental mouse anxiety models. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 100, 259–263 (2011).
Mackintosh, J.H. Factors affecting the recognition of territory boundaries by mice (Mus musculus). Anim. Behav. 21, 464–470 (1973).
Würbel, H., Chapman, R. & Rutland, C. Effect of feed and environmental enrichment on development of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 60, 69–81 (1998).
Van de Weerd, H.A., Van Loo, P.L.P., Van Zutphen, L.F.M., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Preferences for nest boxes as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Anim. Welf. 7, 11–25 (1998).
Gaskill, B.N. et al. Heat or insulation: behavioral titration of mouse preference for warmth or access to a nest. PLoS ONE 7, e32799 (2012).
Roper, T.J. Nesting material as a reinforcer for female mice. Anim. Behav. 21, 733–740 (1973).
Van Loo, P.L., Van Zutphen, L.F. & Baumans, V. Male management: Coping with aggression problems in male laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 37, 300–313 (2003).
Brown, R. in Social odours in mammals (eds RE Brown & DW MacDonald) (Oxford University Press, 1985).
Arakawa, H., Cruz, S. & Deak, T. From models to mechanisms: odorant communication as a key determinant of social behavior in rodents during illness-associated states. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1916–1928 (2011).
Blom, H.J.M., Witkamp, A.C.P., Schlingman, F., Hoogervorst, M.J.C. & Van de Weerd, H.A. in Evaluation of housing conditions for laboratory mice and rats (ed H. J. M. Blom) 81–99 (Febodruk, 1993).
Smith, W. & Ross, S. The hoarding behavior of the mouse. 1. The role of previous feeding experience. J. Genet. Psychol. 82, 279–297 (1953).
Lutz, C.K. & Novak, M.A. Environmental enrichment for nonhuman primates: Theory and application. ILAR J. 46, 178–191 (2005).
Ader, D.N., Johnson, S.B., Huang, S.W. & Riley, W.J. Group size, cage shelf level, and emotionality in non-obese diabetic mice: impact on onset and incidence of IDDM. Psychosom. Med. 53, 313–321 (1991).
Douglas, R.M., Neve, A., Quittenbaum, J.P., Alam, N.M. & Prusky, G.T. Perception of visual motion coherence by rats and mice. Vision Res. 46, 2842–2847 (2006).
Wong, A.A. & Brown, R.E. Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 5, 389–403 (2006).
Sadleir, R.M.F.S. The relationship between agonistic behavior and population-changes in the deermouse, Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner). J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 331–352 (1965).
Simon, M.M. et al. A comparative phenotypic and genomic analysis of C57BL/6J and C57BL/6N mouse strains. Genome Biol. 14, R82 (2013).
Baron, B.W., Langan, G., Huo, D., Baron, J.M. & Montag, A. Squamous cell carcinomas of the skin at ear tag sites in aged FVB/N mice. Comp. Med. 55, 231–235 (2005).
Cover, C.E., Keenan, C.M. & Bettinger, G.E. Ear tag induced Staphylococcus infection in mice. Lab. Anim. 23, 229–233 (1989).
Everitt, J.I. et al. Metal ear tag-induced foreign body tumorigenesis in p53+/- mice. J. Cont. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41, 73 (2002).
Ostfeld, R.S., Miller, M.C. & Schnurr, J. Ear tagging increases tick (Ixodes dammini) infestation rates of white footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). J. Mamm. 74, 651–655 (1993).
Le Calvez, S., Perron-Lepage, M.-F. & Burnett, R. Subcutaneous microchip-associated tumours in B6C3F1 mice: a retrospective study to attempt to determine their histogenesis. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 57, 255–265 (2006).
Gopee, N.V. et al. Response of mouse skin to tattooing: use of SKH-1 mice as a surrogate model for human tattooing. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 209, 145–158 (2005).
Burn, C.C., Deacon, R.M. & Mason, G.J. Marked for life? Effects of early cage-cleaning frequency, delivery batch, and identification tail-marking on rat anxiety profiles. Dev. Psychobiol. 50, 266–277 (2008).
Hiadlovská, Z. et al. Shaking the myth: Body mass, aggression, steroid hormones, and social dominance in wild house mouse. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 223, 16–26 (2015).
Kikusui, T. & Mori, Y. Behavioural and neurochemical consequences of early weaning in rodents. J. Neuroendocrinol. 21, 427–431 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Geomaris Maldonado and Marie Heyer for excellent animal care and support during the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
This work was supported in part by Somark, through the loan of a LabStamp tattooer, although all supplies for tattooing mice were purchased by Charles River. The work was funded by Charles River, as BNG, CW, and KPC were employees of Charles River at the time the work was conducted. BNG and KPC maintain active consulting relationships with Charles River. GBM is a current employee of Charles River.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figure 1 (PDF 1219 kb)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Data (XLSX 23 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaskill, B., Stottler, A., Garner, J. et al. The effect of early life experience, environment, and genetic factors on spontaneous home-cage aggression-related wounding in male C57BL/6 mice. Lab Anim 46, 176–184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1225
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1225
This article is cited by
-
Partially divided caging reduces overall aggression and anxiety which may indicate improved welfare in group housed male C57BL/6J mice
BMC Veterinary Research (2024)
-
The epidemiology of fighting in group-housed laboratory mice
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
The effect of group size, age and handling frequency on inter-male aggression in CD 1 mice
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Cage aggression in group-housed laboratory male mice: an international data crowdsourcing project
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Confidence in preclinical research
Lab Animal (2017)