Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The utility of pain scores obtained during ‘regular reassessment process’ in premature infants in the NICU

Abstract

Objective:

To examine the association of pain assessment scores achieved through regular reassessment practice, as required by the Joint Commission (JC), with painful events and the use of analgesics in premature, ventilated infants.

Study Design:

A cross-sectional study was performed in two tertiary level neonatal intensive care units. Pain was assessed at regular intervals at each center using validated multidimensional instruments in accordance with the JC standards.

Result:

Sample comprised 196 ventilated premature infant patient-days. Overall, 2% of scores suggested the presence of pain, and 0.1% of pain scores were associated with analgesia. Ventilated infants who were exposed to multiple pain-associated procedures in a day never demonstrated pain score elevations despite infrequent preemptive or continuous analgesic administration.

Conclusion:

Pain assessment scores achieved using regular reassessment processes were poorly correlated with exposure to pain-associated procedures or conditions. Low pain scores achieved through regular reassessment may not correlate to low pain exposure. Resources that are expended on regular reassessment processes may need to be reconsidered in light of the low yield for clinical alterations in care in this setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker DP, Rutter N . Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72 (1): F47–F48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 2008; 300 (1): 60–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cignacco E, Hamers J, van Lingen RA, Stoffel L, Büchi S, Müller R et al. Neonatal procedural pain exposure and pain management in ventilated preterm infants during the first 14 days of life. Swiss Med Wkly 2009; 139 (15-16): 226–232.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duhn L, Medves J . A systematic integrative review of infant pain assessment tools. Adv Neonatal Care 2004; 4 (3): 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Assessment of Patients. Vol Standard PE. 1: 42001.

  6. Phillips DM . JCAHO pain management standards are unveiled. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. JAMA 2000; 284 (4): 428–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lynch M . Pain: the fifth vital sign. Comprehensive assessment leads to proper treatment. Adv Nurse Pract 2001; 9 (11): 28–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gordon DB, Rees SM, McCausland MR, Pellino TA, Sanford-Ring S, Smith-Helmenstine J et al. Improving reassessment and documentation of pain management. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34 (9): 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadjistavropoulos T, MacNab YC, Lints-Martindale A, Martin R, Hadjistavropoulos H . Does routine pain assessment result in better care? Pain Res Manag 2009; 14 (3): 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anand KJ, Aranda JV, Berde CB, Buckman S, Capparelli EV, Carlo W et al. Summary proceedings from the neonatal pain-control group. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (3 Pt 2): S9–S22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cignacco E, Hamers JP, Stoffel L, van Lingen RA, Schütz N, Müller R et al. Routine procedures in NICUs: factors influencing pain assessment and ranking by pain intensity. Swiss Med Wkly 2008; 138 (33-34): 484–491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter FL, Wolf CM, Gold J, Lotsoff D, Miller JP . Pain and pain management in newborn infants: a survey of physicians and nurses. Pediatrics 1997; 100 (4): 626–632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens B, Pillai R, Oberlander T, Gibbins S . Assessment of pain in neonates and infants In: Anand K, Stevens B, McGrath P (eds). Pain in Neonates and Infants 3rd edn. Elsevier: Edinburgh, UK, 2007; 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hummel P, Lawlor-Klean P, Weiss MG . Validity and reliability of the N-PASS assessment tool with acute pain. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (7): 474–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hummel P, Puchalski M, Creech SD, Weiss MG . Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain. J Perinatol 2008; 28 (1): 55–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens B, Johnston C, Taddio A, Gibbins S, Yamada J . The premature infant pain profile: evaluation 13 years after development. Clin J Pain 2010; 26 (9): 813–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Axelin A, Ojajarvi U, Viitanen J, Lehtonen L . Promoting shorter duration of ventilator treatment decreases the number of painful procedures in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98 (11): 1751–1755.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Berry PH, Dahl JL . The new JCAHO pain standards: Implications for pain management nurses. Pain Manag Nurs 2000; 1 (1): 3–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Manias E, Botti M, Bucknall T . Observation of pain assesment and management—the complexities of clinical practice. J Clin Nurs 2002; 11 (6): 724–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saigh O, Triola MM, Link RN . Brief report: failure of an electronic medical record tool to improve pain assessment documentation. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (2): 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cignacco E, Hamers JP, Stoffel L, van Lingen RA, Gessler P, McDougall J et al. The efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of procedural pain in preterm and term neonates. A systematic literature review. Eur J Pain 2007; 11 (2): 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simons S, van Dijk M, Anand K, Roofthooft D, van Lingen R, Tibboel D . Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2003; 157 (11): 1058–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was completed while AJR was a predoctoral Jonas Nursing Scholar (Jonas Center for Nursing Excellence, New York, NY, USA), and was supported by a 2010 Nurse Practitioner Healthcare Foundation/Purdue Pharma Pain Management Award. The author thanks Dr Mary W. Byrne at Columbia University and Dr John Lorenz at the Morgan-Stanley Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian Hospital for their support of this research.

Author contributions

Dr Rohan conceptualized the study, designed the data collection instruments, coordinated and carried out data collection at the two institutions, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A J Rohan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohan, A. The utility of pain scores obtained during ‘regular reassessment process’ in premature infants in the NICU. J Perinatol 34, 532–537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.57

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.57

Search

Quick links