Abstract
Respect for patient autonomy remains a foundational principle guiding the ethical practice of medicine—a mission first articulated by Hippocrates. Damocles, another figure from ancient Greece, provides a useful parable for describing performance under distress: Damocles loses his desire for opulence and power when he notices a sword dangling precariously above his head. Contemporary obstetricians deciding whether to forestall or impose major abdominal surgery on parturients entrusted to their care struggle valiantly in the chasm dividing Hippocratic idealism from the economic realism driven by the medicolegal sword of Damocles. Given the inherent risk of unforeseeable and unsalvageable fetal catastrophe during labor and vaginal delivery, and the often unsubstantiated, yet automatic, allegation of negligence that follows a labor-associated adversity, obstetricians—and their liability insurance carriers—have recalibrated obstetric practice in alignment with the increasingly risk-averse preferences of most patients. Indeed, less intrapartum risk for patients and less corresponding medicolegal exposure for obstetricians help explain the rising cesarean delivery rate and, more importantly, the steady disappearance of higher-risk interventions such as vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Is this increasing reluctance to offer VBAC supervision ethically defensible? This paper argues that it is. Fiduciary professionalism mandates physician self-sacrifice, not self-destruction; a VBAC gone awry without negligence or substandard care may, nevertheless, render future affordable liability coverage unattainable. Yet, the unavailability of VBAC infringes on the autonomy of women who want to assume the intrapartum risks of a VBAC in lieu of a repeat cesarean delivery. The proposed solution is the regionalization of VBAC care provision in designated medical centers and/or the implementation of binding arbitration in an ethical trade-off to enhance patient autonomy regarding the preferred mode of delivery despite parallel constraint on legal options.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Liptak A, Moss M . In trial work, Edwards left a trademark. The New York Times. 31 January 2004 Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/31/politics/campaign/31EDWA.html. Retrieved 16 June 2009.
Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581–2589.
Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR . Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicenter trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–1383.
Glezerman M . Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 20–25.
Committee on Obstetric Practice. Mode of term singleton breech delivery: ACOG committee opinion no. 340. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 235–237.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S . Births: Final Data For 2004. National vital statistics reports; vol 55 no 1 National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD 2006 Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr55/nvsr55_01.pdf. Retrieved 16 June 2009.
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ . Births: Preliminary Data For 2005. Health E-Stats. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD 2006. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths05/prelimbirths05.htm. Retrieved 16 June 2009.
Murthy K, Grobman WA, Lee TA, Holl JL . Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1264–1269.
Yang TY, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM . Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care 2009; 47: 234–242.
Jury Verdict Research Current Award Trends in Personal Injury. 43rd ed Available at: http://www.juryverdictresearch.com/Press_Room/Press_releases/Verdict_study/verdictstudy8.html. Retrieved 16 June 2009.
American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Survey on Professional Liability. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Washington, DC, 2006.
MacLennan A, Nelson KB, Hankins G, Speer M . Who will deliver our grandchildren? Implications of cerebral palsy litigation. JAMA 2005; 294: 1688–1690.
Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Alessandri LM, O'Sullivan F, Burton PR et al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ 1998; 317: 1554–1558.
Nelson KB, Grether JK . Potentially asphyxiating conditions and spastic cerebral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 507–513.
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GML . Continuous cardiotocography as a form of electronic fetal monitoring for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 3: CD006066.
Brennan TA, Sox CM, Burstin HR . Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1963–1967.
Stalnaker BL, Maher JE, Kleinman GE, Macksey JM, Fishman LA, Bernard JM . Characteristics of successful claims for payment by the Florida Neurological Injury Compensation Association Fund. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 268–273.
Greene MF . Vaginal birth after cesarean revisited. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2647–2649.
Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD . Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 885–888.
Chervenak FA, McCullough LB . Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1198–1200.
Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864–871.
Kalish RB, McCullough L, Gupta M, Thaler HT, Chervenak FA . Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 1137–1141.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rybak, E. Hippocratic ideal, Faustian bargain and Damocles' sword: erosion of patient autonomy in obstetrics. J Perinatol 29, 721–725 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.123
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.123
This article is cited by
-
The history of autonomy in medicine from antiquity to principlism
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (2018)
-
Der Kaiserschnitt – vielleicht der Geburtsmodus des 21. Jahrhunderts
Der Gynäkologe (2013)
-
Neonatal Mortality Risk for Repeat Cesarean Compared to Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC) Deliveries in the United States, 1998–2002 Birth Cohorts
Maternal and Child Health Journal (2010)
-
Reducing primary cesarean delivery: can we prevent current and future morbidity and mortality?
Journal of Perinatology (2009)