Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Neonatal mortality among low birth weight infants during the initial months of the academic year

Abstract

Objective:

Proper management of very low weight (<1500 g) infants requires specific expertise. During July and August, pediatric interns start new rotations and advance in responsibilities by postgraduate level. We test the hypothesis that low weight births in teaching hospitals exhibit increased neonatal mortality during the initial training months.

Study Design:

Population-based cohort of 5184 very low weight and 15 232 moderately low weight infants in California from 19 regional teaching hospitals with medical training programs. Logistic regression methods controlled for both individual covariates and temporal patterns in neonatal mortality.

Result:

We found no difference in neonatal mortality between very low weight infants born in teaching hospitals during July and August and those born in other months (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78 to 1.23). Investigation of moderately low birth weight infants also indicated no increased neonatal mortality.

Conclusion:

Infants most likely to die in the neonatal period do not appear to be at elevated risk of neonatal mortality during July and August.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rich EC, Gifford G, Luxenberg M, Dowd B . The relationship of house staff experience to the cost and quality of inpatient care. J Am Med Assoc 1990; 263: 953–957.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Claridge JA, Schulman AM, Sawyer RG, Ghezel-Ayagh A, Young JS . The ‘July phenomenon’ and the care of the severely injured patient: fact or fiction? Surgery 2001; 130: 346–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borenstein SH, Choi M, Gerstle JT, Langer JC . Errors and adverse outcomes on a surgical service: what is the role of residents? J Surg Res 2004; 122: 162–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barry WA, Rosenthal GE . Is there a July phenomenon? The effect of July admission on intensive care mortality and length of stay in teaching hospitals. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 639–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford AA, Bateman BT, Simpson LL, Ratan RB . Nationwide data confirms absence of ‘July phenomenon’ in obstetrics: it's safe to deliver in July. J Perinatol 2007; 27: 73–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchwald D, Komaroff AL, Cook EF, Epstein AM . Indirect costs for medical education. Is there a July phenomenon? Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 765–768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffith 3rd CH, Wilson JF, Desai NS, Rich EC . Does pediatric housestaff experience influence tests ordered for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit? Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 704–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Myles TD . Is there an obstetric July phenomenon? Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1080–1084.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Apostolidou I, Katsouyanni K, Touloumi G, Kalpoyannis N, Constantopoulos A, Trichopoulos D . Seasonal variation of neonatal and infant deaths by cause in Greece. Scand J Soc Med 1994; 22: 74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuda S, Kahyo H . Seasonality of preterm births in Japan. Int J Epidemiol 1992; 21: 91–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF . Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007; 55: 1–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. California Department of Health Services, Center for Health Statistics. Birth Cohort Public Use File, 1999–2003. Sacramento, CA, 2006.

  13. California Children's Services. CCS approved neonatal intensive care units. Department of Health Services, Children's Medical Services, California Children's Services: Sacramento, CA, 2000, pp 1–29.

  14. Catalano R, Serxner S . Time series designs of potential interest to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 724–731.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. SAS Institute Inc.. Version 9.0.1. Cary, NC, 2006.

  16. Liu L, Hudak G . Forecasting and Time Series Analysis Using the SCA Statistical System. Scientific Computing Associates: Villa Park, IL, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pollack MM, Cuerdon TT, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR, Levetown M . Impact of quality-of-care factors on pediatric intensive care unit mortality. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 941–946.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Ruth L Kirschstein National Research Service Award (within the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality) supported the analyses described in this manuscript. We thank Ralph Catalano for statistical assistance and for valuable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We are also indebted to Elizabeth Anderson for data management of the Birth Cohort File.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T A Bruckner.

Additional information

Disclosure

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruckner, T., Carlo, W., Ambalavanan, N. et al. Neonatal mortality among low birth weight infants during the initial months of the academic year. J Perinatol 28, 691–695 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.72

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.72

Keywords

Search

Quick links