Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Urinary albumin excretion is associated with true resistant hypertension

Abstract

Resistant (or refractory) hypertension (RH) is a clinical diagnosis based on blood pressure (BP) office measurements. About one third of subjects with suspected RH have indeed pseudo-resistant hypertension and 24-h ambulatory-blood pressure-monitoring aids to precisely identify them. Our aim was to determine those clinical, laboratory or echocardiographic variables that may be associated with subjects with sustained hypertension (namely true RH). We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of 143 patients consecutively enrolled with the clinical diagnosis of RH. All patients underwent clinical-demographic, laboratory evaluation, 2D-echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory-blood pressure-monitoring. Pseudo-resistant hypertension or white-coat RH was defined if office BP was 140 and/or 90 mm Hg and 24-h BP <130/80 mm Hg. One-hundred and three (72%) patients had true RH and 40 (28%) patients had white-coat RH. True RH patients had significantly higher diabetes prevalence and higher office-systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels. Regarding target organ damage, left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and 24-h urinary albumin excretion (UAE) were also higher in true RH after adjustment for possible confounders (P=0.031 and P=0.012, respectively). In a logistic regression analysis, only office-SBP (multivariate OR (95%CI): 1.030 (1.003–1.057), P=0.030) and UAE (multivariate OR (95% CI): 2.376 (1.225–4.608), P=0.010) were independently associated with true RH. We conclude that true resistant hypertension is associated with silent target organ damage, especially UAE. In patients with suspected RH, assessment of 24 h ambulatory BP is the most accurate way to detect a population with high risk for target-organ damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; 25: 1105–1187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al., the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The JNC 7 Report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Muxfeldt ES, Bloch KV, Nogueira Ada R, Salles GF . True resistant hypertension: is it possible to be recognized in the office? Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (12 Pt 1): 1534–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernández del Rey R, Armario P, Martín-Baranera M, Castellanos P . Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors and prevalence of metabolic syndrome in subjects with resistant hypertension. Med Clín (Barc) 2006; 127: 241–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown MA, Buddle ML, Martin A . Is resistant hypertension really resistant? Am J Hypertens 2001; 14: 1263–1269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan NM . Resistant hypertension. J Hypertens 2005; 23: 1441–1444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuspidi C, Macca G, Sampieri L, Michev I, Salerno M, Fusi V et al. High prevalence of cardiac and extracardiac target organ damage in refractory hypertension. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 2063–2070.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernández del Rey R, Armario P, Martín-Baranera M, Sánchez P, Cárdenas G, Pardell H . Target-organ damage and cardiovascular risk profile in resistant hypertension. Influence of the white-coat effect. Blood Press Monit 1998; 3: 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pierdomenico SD, Lapenna D, Bucci A, Di Tommaso R, Di Mascio R, Manente BM et al. Cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 1422–1428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Redón J, Campo C, Narciso ML, Rodicio JL, Pascual JM, Ruilope LM . Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in refractory hypertension: a prospective study. Hypertension 1998; 31: 712–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salles GF, Cardoso CRL, Muxfeldt ES . Prognostic influence of office and ambulatory blood pressures in resistant hypertension. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 2340–2346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Salles GF, Fiszman R, Cardoso CRL, Muxfeldt ES . Relation of left ventricular hypertrophy with systemic inflammation and endothelial damage in resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2007; 50: 723–728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nogueira AD, Fernandes AS, Coutinho ES, Salles GF, Muxfeld ES, Bloch KV . Factors associated with microalbuminuria in resistant hypertension. Int J Cardiol 2007; 121: 86–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ASE Committee Recommendations. Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standard Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klausen K, Borch-Johnsen K, Feldt-Rasmussen B, Jensen G, Clausen P, Scharling H et al. Very low levels of microalbuminuria are associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease and death independently of renal function, hypertension, and diabetes. Circulation 2004; 110: 32–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hillege HL, Fidler V, Diercks GF, van Gilst WH, de Zeeuw D, van Veldhuisen DJ et al. Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) Study Group. Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation 2002; 106: 1777–1782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wachtell K, Ibsen H, Olsen MH, Borch-Johnsen K, Lindholm LH, Mogensen CE et al. Albuminuria and cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arnlöv J, Evans JC, Meigs JB, Wang TJ, Fox CS, Levy D et al. Low-grade albuminuria and incidence of cardiovascular disease events in nonhypertensive and nondiabetic individuals. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2005; 112: 969–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Calhoun DA, Jones D, Textor S, Goff DC, Murphy TP, Toto RD et al. Resistant Hypertension: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of he Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2008; 51: 1403–1419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Black HR, Elliott WJ, Neaton JD, Grandits G, Grambsch P, Grimm Jr RH et al. Baseline characteristics and early blood pressure control in the CONVINCE Trial. Hypertension 2001; 37: 12–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–2997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muxfeldt ES, Bloch KV, Nogueira AR, Salles GF . Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring pattern of resistant hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal R, Andersen MJ . Correlates of systolic hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease. Hypertension 2005; 46: 514–520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL . Resistant hypertension. An overview of evaluation and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1749–1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuyun MF, Adler AI, Wareham NJ . What is the evidence that microalbuminuria is a predictor of cardiovascular disease events? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2005; 14: 271–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Palatini P, Graniero GR, Mormino P, Mattarei M, Sanzuol F, Cignacco GB et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of microalbuminuria in stage I hypertension. Results from the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study (HARVEST Study). Am J Hypertens 1996; 9 (4 Pt 1): 334–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Palatini P, Canali C, Dorigatti F, Baccillieri S, Giovinazzo P, Roman E et al. Target organ damage and ambulatory blood pressure in stage I hypertension. The Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study. Blood Press Monit 1997; 2: 79–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Martínez MA, Moreno A, Aguirre de Cárcer A, Cabrera R, Rocha R, Torre A et al. Frequency and determinants of microalbuminuria in mild hypertension: a primary-care based study. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wiinberg N, Bang LA, Wachtell K, Larsen J, Olsen MH, Tuxen C et al. 24-h Ambulatory blood pressure in patients with ECG-determined left ventricular hypertrophy: left ventricular geometry and urinary albumin excretion—a LIFE substudy. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18: 391–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bakris G . Proteinuria: a link to understanding changes in vascular compliance? Hypertension 2005; 46: 473–474.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kramer H, Jacobs Jr DR, Bild D, Post W, Saad MF, Detrano R et al. Urine albumin excretion and subclinical cardiovascular disease. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Hypertension 2005; 46: 38–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gerstein HC, Mann JF, Yi Q, Zinman B, Dinneen SF, Hoogwerf B et al. Albuminuria and risk of cardiovascular events, death, and heart failure in diabetic and nondiabetic individuals. JAMA 2001; 286: 421–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Klausen K, Scharling H, Jensen G, Jensen JS . New definition of microalbuminuria in hypertensive subjects: association with incident coronary heart disease and death. Hypertension 2005; 46: 33–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hallan S, Astor B, Romundstad S, Aasarød K, Kvenild K, Coresh J . Association of kidney function and albuminuria with cardiovascular mortality in older vs younger individuals. The HUNT II Study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 2490–2496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Agarwal R, Bunaye Z, Bekele DM . Prognostic significance of between-arm blood pressure differences. Hypertension 2008; 51: 657–662.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by a grant from the Societat Catalana d’Hipertensió Arterial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Oliveras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveras, A., Armario, P., Hernández-del Rey, R. et al. Urinary albumin excretion is associated with true resistant hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 24, 27–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.35

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.35

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links