Abstract
We investigated the autonomic innervation of the penis by using evoked cavernous activity (ECA). We recruited seven men with thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) and sexual dysfunction, and six men who were scheduled to have pelvic surgery (PS), specifically non-nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy. In the PS patients, ECA was performed both pre- and postoperatively. The left median nerve was electrically stimulated and ECA was recorded with two concentric electromyography needles placed into the right and left cavernous bodies. We simultaneously recorded hand and foot sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) as controls. In the SCI group, all but one patient had reproducible hand SSRs. None of these patients had ECA or foot SSRs. All the PS patients had reproducible ECA and SSRs, both preoperatively and postoperatively. There was no difference in the latency and amplitude measurements of ECA and SSRs in the postoperative compared with that of the pre-operative period (P>0.05). In conclusion, ECA is absent in men with SCI above the sympathetic outflow to the genitalia. In men, after radical pelvic surgery, ECA is preserved, indicating the preservation of sympathetic fibers.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 8 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $32.38 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E, Barilan Y, Vardi Y . Corpus cavernosum electromyogram: spontaneous and evoked electrical activities. J Urol 1995; 153 (3 Pt 1): 653–654.
Yilmaz U, Soylu A, Ozcan C, Kutlu R, Gunes A . Evoked cavernous activity. J Urol 2002; 167: 188–191.
Yang CC, Yilmaz U, Vicars BG . Evoked cavernous activity: normal values. J Urol 2008; 179: 2312–2316.
Yilmaz U, Ellis W, Lange P, Yang C . Evoked cavernous activity: measuring penile autonomic innervation following pelvic surgery. Int J Impot Res 2006; 18: 296–301.
Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.
Vetrugno R, Liguori R, Cortelli P, Montagna P . Sympathetic skin response: basic mechanisms and clinical applications. Clin Auton Res 2003; 13: 256–270.
Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R, Leung RA, Kurokawa K, Murakami G et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J Urol 2007; 177: 225–229.
Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M . Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using cadavers. Urology 2005; 65: 136–142.
Terada N, Arai Y, Kurokawa K, Ohara H, Ichioka K, Matui Y et al. Intraoperative electrical stimulation of cavernous nerves with monitoring of intracorporeal pressure to confirm nerve-sparing during radical prostatectomy: early clinical results. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 251–256.
Savoie M, Kim SS, Soloway MS . A prospective study measuring penile length in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2003; 169: 1462–1464.
Sievert KD, Hennenlotter J, Laible I, Amend B, Schilling D, Anastasiadis A et al. The periprostatic autonomic nerves—bundle or layer? Eur Urol 2008; 54: 1109–1116.
Giuliano F, Rampin O, Jardin A, Rousseau JP . Electrophysiological study of relations between the dorsal nerve of the penis and the lumbar sympathetic chain in the rat. J Urol 1993; 150: 1960–1964.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH NIDDK 1 R21 DK069315.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, U., Vicars, B. & Yang, C. Evoked cavernous activity: neuroanatomic implications. Int J Impot Res 21, 301–305 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2009.34
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2009.34