Abstract
The genetic basis of floral variation influencing the mating system of Jamaican populations of homostylous Turnera ulmifolia var. angustifolia was investigated using controlled crosses and open-pollinated families. Crosses between plants with large differences in stigma-anther separation and analysis of F2 and backcross generations gave unimodal distributions for all floral characters. No evidence for major gene control of floral variation was obtained and results were contrary to expectations based on segregation at the distyly locus. These data and the continuous distribution of phenotypes among populations indicate that variation is polygenically controlled. Generation means from a cross between plants exhibiting extreme differences in stigma-anther separation could be accounted for by simple biometrical models. An additive-dominance model explained variation in style length while addition of a digenic epistatic parameter was required to account for variation in stamen length and stigma-anther separation. Estimation of repeatabilities and broad-sense heritability indicated genetic variation for style length, stamen length and stigma-anther separation within populations. No genetic correlation was evident for style and stamen length suggesting that selection acting on the mating system of homostylous populations would yield a response.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Barrett, S C H. 1978. Heterostyly in a tropical weed: the reproductive biology of the Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Can J Bot, 56, 1713–1725.
Barrett, S C H, and Shore, J S. 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Evolution, 41, 340–354.
Breese, E L. 1959. Selection for differing degrees of outbreeding in Nicotiana rustica. Annals of Botany, 23, 331–344.
Cavalli, L L. 1952. An analysis of linkage in quantitative inheritance. Reeve, E. C. R. and Waddington, C. H. (eds) Quantitative Inheritance. HMSO London.
Charlesworth, B, and Charlesworth, D. 1979. The maintenance and breakdown of distyly. Amer Nat, 114, 499–513.
Cockerham, C C. 1986. Modifications in estimating the num-ber of genes for a quantitative character. Genetics, 114, 659–664.
Ennos, R A. 1981. Quantitative studies of the mating system in two sympatric species of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Genetica, 57, 93–98.
Falconer, D S. 1981.Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman Inc., New York.
Fisher, R A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Annals of Eugenics, 11, 53–63.
Gale, J S, and Eaves, L J. 1972. Variation in wild popula-tions of Papaver dubium. V. The application of factor analysis to the study of variation. Heredity, 29, 135–149.
Hauptli, H, and Jain, S K. 1985. Genetic variation in out-crossing rate and correlated floral traits in a population of grain amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.). Genetica, 66, 21–27.
Holsinger, K E, Feldman, M W, and Christiansen, F B. 1984. The evolution of self-fertilization in plants: A population genetic model. Amer Nat 124, 446–453.
Jain, S K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 7, 469–495.
Lande, R. 1977. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters. Genetics, 86, 485–498.
Lande, R. 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics, 99, 541–553.
Lande, R, and Schemske, D W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40.
Macnair, M R, and Cumbes, Q J. 1989. The genetic archi-tecture of interspecific variation in Mimulus. Genetics, 122, 211–222.
Manshardt, R M, and Bassett, M J. 1984. Inheritance of stigma position in Phaseolus vulgaris x P. coccineus hybrid populations. Journal of Heredity, 75, 45–50.
Marshall, D F, and Abbott, R J. 1982. Polymorphism for outcrossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. I. Evidence. Heredity, 48, 227–235.
Mather, K, and Jinks, J L. 1982.Biometrical Genetics. Chap-man and Hall, London.
Maynard Smith, J. 1978.The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mitchell-Olds, T, Rutledge, J J. 1986. Quantitative genetics in natural plant populations: A review of the theory. Amer Nat 127, 379–402.
Moore, D M, and Lewis, H. 1965. The evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana. Evolution, 19, 104–114.
Moran, P A P. 1962.The Statistical Processes of Evolutionary Theory. Clarendon, Oxford.
Nagylaki, T. 1976. A model for the evolution of self-fertiliz-ation and vegetative reproduction. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 58, 55–58.
Neter, J, and Wasserman, W. 1974.Applied Linear Statis-tical Models. Irwin, Illinois.
Nettancourt, D D E. 1977.Incompatibility in Angiosperms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Rick, C M, and Dempsey, W H. 1969. Position of the stigma in relation to fruit setting of the tomato. Botanical Gazette, 130, 180–186.
Schemske, D W, and Lande, R. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empircal observations.Evolution, 39, 41–52.
Schoen, D J. 1982. Genetic variation and the breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia. Evolution, 36, 352–360.
Shore, J S, and Barrett, S C H. 1985. The genetics of distyly and homostyly in Turnera ulmifolia L. (Turner-aceae). Heredity, 55, 167–174.
Squillace, A E. 1974. Average genetic correlations among offspring from open-pollinated forest trees. Silvae Genetica, 23, 149–156.
Thoday, J M, and Thompson, J N. 1976. The number of segregating genes implied by continuous variation. Genetica, 46, 335–344.
Urban, I. 1883.Monographie de Familie der Turneracean. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.
Wells, H. 1979. Self-fertilization: advantageous or deleterious? Evolution, 33, 252–255.
Westergaard, M. 1958. The mechanism of sex determination in dioecious flowering plants. Adv Genet 9, 217–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shore, J., Barrett, S. Quantitative genetics of floral characters in homostylous Turnera ulmifolia var. angustifolia Willd. (Turneraceae). Heredity 64, 105–112 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1990.13
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1990.13
This article is cited by
-
Genetics of distyly and homostyly in a self-compatible Primula
Heredity (2019)
-
Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns
Heredity (2006)
-
The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae)
Heredity (1995)
-
Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex
Heredity (1994)
-
Inheritance of mating-system modifier genes in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae)
Heredity (1994)