Abstract
The effect of larval density on male mating success has been investigated with two strains of Drosophila melanogaster, a wild strain and a mutant strain, under low and high larval competition, and four different genotypic frequencies. The results show a strong sexual selection against mutant males when flies have been raised under low larval competition. Under high larval competition, there is a reduction in mating disadvantage of mutant males. In both instances, a frequency-dependent sexual selection exists. These results explain adequately the evolution of experimental populations where egg to adult viability and male mating success are the most important components of fitness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Alpatov, W W. 1932. Egg production in Drosophila melanogaster and some factors which influence it. J Exp Zool, 63, 111.
Alvarez, G, and Fontdevila, A. 1981. Selección sexual y apareamiento ai azar en Drosophila melanogaster. Genét Ibér, 33, 1–18.
Anderson, W W, and Watanabe, T K. 1974. Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics, 77, 559–564.
Anderson, W W, and McGuire, P R. 1978. Mating pattern and mating success in Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes in large experimental populations. Evolution, 32, 416–423.
Anderson, W W, Levine, L, Olvera, O, Powell, J R, de la Rosa, M E, Salceda, V M, Gaso, M I, and Guzman, J. 1979. Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 76, 1519–1523.
Anderson, W W, and Brown, C J. 1984. A test for rare male mating advantage with Drosophila pseudoobscura karyotypes. Genetics, 107, 577–589.
Anxolabéhère, D. 1980. The influence of sexual and larval selection on the maintenance of polymorphism at the sepia locus in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 95, 743–755.
Ayala, F J. 1972. Frequency-dependent mating advantage in Drosophila. Behav Genet, 2, 85–91.
Ayala, F J, and Campbell, C A. 1974. Frequency-dependent selection. Annu Rev Ecol System, 5, 115–138.
Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food among larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Neerl Zool, 14, 200–281.
Barker, J S F, and Podger, R N. 1970a. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: effects of larval density on viability, developmental period and adult body weight. Ecology, 51, 170–189.
Barker, J S F, and Podger, R N. 1970b. Interspecific competition between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans: effects of larval density and short term adult starvation on fecundity, egg hatchability and adult viability. Ecology, 51, 885–864.
Barker, J S F. 1973. Adult population density, fecundity and production in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia, 11, 85–92.
Bentvelzen, P. 1963. Some interrelations between density and genetic structure of a Drosophila population. Genetica, 34, 229–241.
Birch, H C. 1955. Selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura in relation to crowding. Evolution, 9, 389–399.
Bryant, H C, Kence, A, and Kimball, K T. 1980. A rare male advantage in the housefly induced by wing-clipping and some general considerations for Drosophila. Genetics, 96, 975–993.
Bundgaard, J, and Christiansen, F. 1972. Dynamics of polymorphisms: I. Selection components in an experimental population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 71, 439–460.
Clark, A G, and Feldman, M W. 1981. Density-dependent fertility selection in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 98, 849–869.
Eckstrand, I A, and Seiger, M B. 1975. Population density and mating rates in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution, 29, 287–295.
Ehrman, L, and Parsons, P A. 1981. Behavior, Genetics and Evolution. McGraw Hill. New York.
Goux, M, and Anxolabehere, D. 1980. The measurement of sexual isolation and selection: a critique. Heredity, 45, 255–262.
Lewontin, R C, and Matsuo, Y. 1963. Interaction of genotypes determining viability in Drosophila busckii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 49, 270–278.
Lewontin, R C, Kirk, D, and Crow, J. 1968. Selective mating, assortative mating and inbreeding: definition and implications. Eugenics Quart, 15, 141–143.
Markow, T A. 1980. Rare male advantage among Drosophila of the same laboratory strain. Behav Genet, 10, 553–556.
Mensua, J L, and Moya, A. 1983. Stopped development in overcrowded cultures of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 51, 347–352.
Merrel, D J, and Underhill, J C. 1956. Competition between mutants in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 41, 469–485.
Moth, J J. 1974. Density, frequency and interspecific competition: Fertility of Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia, 14, 237–246.
Mueller, L D, and Ayala, F J. 1981. Fitness and density-dependent population growth in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 77, 667–677.
Partridge, L, and Gardner, A. 1983. Failure to replicate the results of an experiment on the rare male effect in Drosophila melanogaster. Am Nat, 122, 422–427.
Pearl, R. 1932. The influence of density of a population upon egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool, 63, 57–84.
Petit, C. 1951. Le role de l'isolement sexuel dans l'évolution des populations de Drosophila melanogaster. Bull Biol France et Belgique, 95, 392–418.
Petit, C, and Ehrman, L. 1969. Sexual selection. In Dobzhansky, Th., Hecht, M. K. and Steere, W. C. (eds) Drosophila. Evolutionary Biology, vol. 3. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 177–223.
Petit, C, and Nouaud, D. 1984. The maintenance of the lethal gene curly in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 53, 269–281.
Pownser, L. 1935. The effects of temperature on the duration of the developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Physiol Zool, 8, 474–520.
Prout, T. 1971a. The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. The estimation of fitness components. Genetics, 68, 127–149.
Prout, T. 1971b. The relation between fitness components and population prediction in Drosophila. Genetics, 68, 151–167.
Ribo, G. 1968. New mutants of Drosophila melanogaster: caramel (ca) antenas (ants) and quetas finas (q.f.) D.I.S. 43 : 59.
Ribo, G. 1976. Valor selectivo del mutante “caramel” de Drosophila melanogaster, procedente de una población natural. Ph.D. Universidad de Barcelona.
Ribo, G. 1977. Méchanisme de maintien de l'allèle Bar dans une population expérimentale de Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Zool Exp, 118, 375–389.
Robertson, F W, and Sang, J H. 1944. The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. I. Fecundity of adult flies. Proc Roy Soc Lond, 132, 258–277.
Sameoto, D D, and Miller, R S. 1966. Factors controlling the productivity of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Ecology, 47, 695–704.
Sang, J H. 1949. The ecological determinants of population growth in a Drosophila culture. III. Larval and pupal survival. Physiol Zool, 22, 183–202.
Sokoloff, A. 1955. Competition between sibling species of the pseudoobscura subgroup of Drosophila. Ecological monographs, 25, 387–409.
Spiess, E B, and Spiess, L D. 1969. Mating propensity, chromosomal polymorphism, and dependent conditions in Drosophila persimilis. II. Factors between larvae and between adults. Evolution, 23, 225–236.
Spiess, E B. 1970. Mating propensity and its genetics basis in Drosophila. In Hecht, M. C. and Steere, W. C. (eds) Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 315–379.
Spiess, E B, and Kruckeberg, J F. 1980. Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. II. A behavioral basis. Am Nat, 115, 307–327.
Spiess, E B. 1982a. Do females flies choose their mates? Am Nat, 119, 675–693.
Spiess, E B. 1982b. Minority mating advantage of certain eye color mutants of Drosophila, melanogaster. III. Female discrimination and genetic background. Behav Genet, 12, 209–221.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ribó, G., Ocaña, J. & Prevosti, A. Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 63, 195–202 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.92
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1989.92
This article is cited by
-
High-throughput fecundity measurements in Drosophila
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
The Effect of Male Mating Competitiveness, Developmental Rate, and Viability of Larvae and Pupae in Drosophila melanogaster Heterozygous for the Temperature-Sensitive Lethal Mutation l(2)M167 DTS on the Dynamics of the Mutation Elimination from the Population
Russian Journal of Genetics (2005)
-
Determination of Fitness Components of Flies Bearing the Recessive Lethal l(2)M167 DTS Mutation with Dominant Heat Sensitivity in Artificial Drosophila melanogaster Populations
Russian Journal of Genetics (2005)
-
Bias and efficiency in estimating sexual selection. Levene's Z index and some resampling alternatives
Heredity (1991)