Abstract
Axial length and corneal curvature are entered into formulae to calculate intraocular lens power for cataract surgery and the absolute measurement of fundus structures such as neuroretinal rim area in glaucoma. The reproducibility (coefficient of variation, CV) of biometry and keratometry was investigated by taking five measurements of thirty phakic eyes. Although both techniques were found to be highly reproducible (CV<1%), keratometry was the more so. However, a clinically significant difference was noted between the first and the mean of five readings for both biometry (0.15 ± 0.05 mm) and keratometry (0.05 ± 0.03). Taken together, these errors would result in a postoperative refractive error of 0.65D using the SRK formula. Measurement errors were just as likely to occur with short or long eyes. Similar results were found when the analysis was performed on three measurements of both axial length and corneal curvatures. We recommend taking the average of three biometry and keratometry readings to improve the reliability of the techniques, and to increase the accuracy of calculating intraocular lens power and fundus structure dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Littmann H : The determination of the true size of objects in the background of the living eye. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1982, 180: 286–92.
Caprioli J and Miller JM : Correlation of structure and function in glaucoma. Quantitative measurements of disc and field. Ophthalmology 1988, 95: 723.
Jonas JB : Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988, 226: 531–8.
Caprioli J, Ortiz-Colberg R, Miller JM, Tressler C : Measurements of peripapillary nerve fibre layer contour in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989, 108: 404–13.
Longstaff S : Factors affecting intraocular lens power calculation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986, 105: 642–46.
Hillman JS : The selection of intraocular lens power by calculation and by reference to the refraction—a clinical study. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1982, 102: 495–7.
Halliday BL : Calculation of intraocular lens power—results in practice. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986, 105: 435–40.
Thompson SM and Mohan-Roberts V : A comparison of postoperative results with and without intraocular lens power calculation. Br J Ophthalmol 1986, 70: 22–5.
Hope-Ross M and Mooney D : Intraocular lens power calculation. Eye 1988, 2: 367–9.
Singh M and Dahalan A : Significance of intraocular lens power calculation. Br J Ophthamol 1987, 71: 850–3.
Thompson SM and Mohan-Roberts V : Clinical indications for intraocular lens power calculation: A prospective randomised study. Eye 1989, 3: 696–703.
Singh K, Sommer A, Jensen AD, Payne JW : Intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 1987, 105: 1046–50.
Hannush SB, Crawford SL, Waring GO, Gemmill MC, Lynn MJ, Nizham A : Reproducibility of normal corneal power measurements with a keratometer, photokerascope and video imaging system. Arch Ophthalmol 1990, 108: 539–44.
Sanders DR and Kraff MC : A comparison of the Digital biometry ruler—300 and Echo-oculo-meter-3000: A report of 200 cases. Am Intraocular Implant Soc J 1982, 8: 365–9.
Gregory PTS, Esbester RM, Boaze DL : Accuracy of routine intraocular lens power calculation in a district general hospital. Br J Ophthalmol 1989, 73: 57–60.
Lindstrom RL, Lindstrom CW, Harris WS : Accuracy of lens implant power determination using A-scan. Contact Lens 1979, 5: 61–6.
Richards SC, Olsen RJ, Richards WL : Factors associated with poor predictability by intraocular lens calculation formulae. Arch Ophthalmol 1985, 103: 515–8.
Holladay JT, Prager TC, Ruiz RS, Lewis JW, Rosenthal H : Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 1986, 104: 539–41.
Insler MS : Liability for intraocular lens calculations. Am J Ophthalmol 1990, 110: 578–9.
Coleman DJ, Lizzi FL, Franzen LA, Abramson DH : A determination of the velocity of ultrasound in cataractous lenses. Bibl Ophthalmol 1975, 83: 246–51.
Hoffer KJ : Biometry of 7500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1980, 90: 360–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butcher, J., O'Brien, C. The reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements. Eye 5, 708–711 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.130
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.130
This article is cited by
-
The relationship between axial length, age and intraocular pressure in children with primary congenital glaucoma
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography
Scientific Reports (2017)
-
Refractive outcomes comparison between the Lenstar LS 900® optical biometry and immersion A-scan ultrasound
International Ophthalmology (2015)
-
Measurement of axial length in the calculation of intraocular lens power
Eye (1998)
-
Letter
Eye (1997)