Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Interventions and public health nutrition

Consuming a diet complying with front-of-pack label criteria may reduce cholesterol levels: a modeling study

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Front-of-pack nutrition labels can help consumers to make healthier choices and stimulate healthier product development. This is the first modeling study to investigate the potential impact on cholesterol levels of consuming a diet consisting of products that comply with the criteria for a ‘healthier choice logo’.

Subjects/Methods:

National food consumption and food composition data were used to estimate the nutrient intake of the Dutch adult population (18–70 years) before and after replacing foods that did not comply with the Choices front-of-pack label criteria. Different scenarios were established. The difference in cholesterol levels in the Dutch population was assessed before and after replacement by means of equations from meta-analyses that calculate how blood lipids change when diet composition changes.

Results:

After replacing non-complying products with products, which comply with the label's criteria (maximum scenario), saturated fatty acids median intake reduced from 14.5 to 9.8 en%. Trans-fatty acids reduced from 0.95 to 0.57 en%. The average predicted changes in low-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels were −0.25 and −0.31 mmol/l, respectively. Because high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels reduced as well (−0.05 mmol/l), overall, the result was a slightly positive change in the total cholesterol/HDL ratio (−0.03).

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest that the consumption of foods complying with the criteria for a front-of-pack label could contribute moderately to cardiovascular risk reduction via influencing blood lipids. These findings were independent of other potential effects on related health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrup A, Dyerberg J, Elwood P, Hermansen K, Hu FB, Jakobsen MU et al. (2011). The role of reducing intakes of saturated fat in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: where does the evidence stand in 2010? Am J Clin Nutr 93, 684–688.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browner WS, Westenhouse J, Tice JA (1991). What if Americans ate less fat? A quantitative estimate of the effect on mortality. JAMA 265, 3285–3291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dötsch-Klerk M, Jansen L (2008). The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17, 383–386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (2001). Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285, 2486–2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO (2003). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. World Health Organization: Geneva.

  • Institute of Medicine (2010). Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Institute of Medicine: Washington DC.

  • Ireland DM, Clifton PM, Keogh JB (2010). Achieving the salt intake target of 6 g/day in the current food supply in free-living adults using two dietary education strategies. J Am Diet Assoc 110, 763–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen MU, O’Reilly EJ, Heitmann BL, Pereira MA, Balter K, Fraser GE et al. (2009). Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1425–1432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katan MB (2006). Alternatives to low-fat diets. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 989–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katan MB (2010). Katan calculator: predicted effect of diet on blood lipids and lipoproteins. Web tool available at www.katancalculator.nl. Accessed: January 2011.

  • Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, Halsey J et al. (2007). Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000 vascular deaths. Lancet 370, 1829–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensink RP, Zock PL, Kester AD, Katan MB (2003). Effects of dietary fatty acids and carbohydrates on the ratio of serum total to HDL cholesterol and on serum lipids and apolipoproteins: a meta-analysis of 60 controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 1146–1155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffarian D, Katan MB, Ascherio A, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC (2006). Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 354, 1601–1613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S (2010). Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med 7, e1000252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) (2006). Dutch Food Composition Database Website http://www.rivm.nl/nevo. Accessed: January 2011.

  • Provencher V, Polivy J, Herman CP (2009). Perceived healthiness of food. If it's healthy, you can eat more!. Appetite 52, 340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodenburg AJC, Temme EHM, Howell Davies O, Seidell JC (2009). Potential impact of the choices programme on nutrient intakes in the Dutch population. Nutr Bull 34, 318–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (1992). The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. Oxford university press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks G, Veerman JL, Moodie M, Swinburn B (2011). ‘Traffic-light’ nutrition labelling and ‘junk-food’ tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes (Lond) 35, 1001–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stampfer MJ, Sacks FM, Salvini S, Willett WC, Hennekens CH (1991). A prospective study of cholesterol, apolipoproteins, and the risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 325, 373–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenhuis IH, Kroeze W, Vyth EL, Valk S, Verbauwen R, Seidell JC (2010). The effects of using a nutrition logo on consumption and product evaluation of a sweet pastry. Appetite 55, 707–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley L (2007). Review of ‘Front of Pack’ Nutrition Schemes. European Heart Network: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temme EH, van der Voet H, Roodenburg AJ, Bulder A, van Donkersgoed G, van Klaveren J (2011). Impact of foods with health logo on saturated fat, sodium and sugar intake of young Dutch adults. Public Health Nutr 14, 635–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Health Council of the Netherlands (2006). Guidelines for a Healthy Diet 2006. The Health Council of the Netherlands: The Hague.

  • The Netherlands Nutrition Centre (1998). The Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 1997–1998. The Netherlands Nutrition Centre: The Hague.

  • The Netherlands Nutrition Centre (2006). Dutch Food Composition Database. The Netherlands Nutrition Centre: The Hague.

  • Vyth EL, Steenhuis IH, Heymans MW, Roodenburg AJ, Brug J, Seidell JC (2011). Influence of placement of a nutrition logo on cafeteria menu items on lunchtime food Choices at Dutch work sites. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyth EL, Steenhuis IH, Mallant SF, Mol ZL, Brug J, Temminghoff M et al. (2009). A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands. J Health Commun 14, 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyth EL, Steenhuis IH, Roodenburg AJ, Brug J, Seidell JC (2010a). Front-of-pack nutrition label stimulates healthier product development: a quantitative analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyth EL, Steenhuis IH, Vlot JA, Wulp A, Hogenes MG, Looije DH et al. (2010b). Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice. Public Health Nutr 13, 1882–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weggemans RM, Zock PL, Katan MB (2001). Dietary cholesterol from eggs increases the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 73, 885–891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2004). Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E L Vyth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

AJCR was seconded at VU University Amsterdam and is employed by Unilever R&D, the Netherlands. Rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest. ELV was funded by the Choices Foundation. The Choices Foundation had no role in the study design, analysis or interpretation of the data. MAHH, JMAR and HV were funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vyth, E., Hendriksen, M., Roodenburg, A. et al. Consuming a diet complying with front-of-pack label criteria may reduce cholesterol levels: a modeling study. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 510–516 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.193

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.193

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links